[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Steve Storck commented on ARQ-2017: ----------------------------------- [~thomas.diesler] : I notice that the "org.jboss.arquillian.osgi" package is listed both under <Private-Package> and also under <_exportcontents>. I assume that you would prefer one or the other. Let me know which one is appropriate and I will remove the duplicate from the other element. I am also curious why you have declined to inline the embedded dependencies, but to embed them as jars instead. There may be classloader improvements, among other things, if they are inlined instead. Are there licensing issues that require you to embed the jars? Otherwise, I would like to try inlining them instead. Please let me know. Thanks! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)