5:29 a.m.
Hi all,
I’m currently trying to report vertx instance to inventory, therefore I am
doing some experiments that is communicating to the server with REST API.
Wondering if there’s a way not to run an entire hawkular server (because
i’m working on my laptop) but the inventory component alone? or any other
better way to do that?
10:07 a.m.
Hey Austin,
Can you describe your laptop setup?
If your laptop resources are constrained, you might try to run an external,
tuned down Cassandra node with ccm (https://github.com/pcmanus/ccm). And
then start the Hawkular server without embedded Cassandra (
http://www.hawkular.org/docs/user/installation-guide.html#_using_an_exter...
).
Regards,
2016-05-27 5:29 GMT+02:00 Austin Kuo <auszon3(a)gmail.com>:
Hi all,
I’m currently trying to report vertx instance to inventory, therefore I am
doing some experiments that is communicating to the server with REST API.
Wondering if there’s a way not to run an entire hawkular server (because
i’m working on my laptop) but the inventory component alone? or any other
better way to do that?
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
--
Thomas Segismont
JBoss ON Engineering Team
10:53 a.m.
Hi Austin, inline...
On 2016-05-27 05:29, Austin Kuo wrote:
Hi all,
I’m currently trying to report vertx instance to inventory, therefore I
am doing some experiments that is communicating to the server with REST
API. Wondering if there’s a way not to run an entire hawkular server
(because i’m working on my laptop) but the inventory component alone?
Yes, that's exactly what we do when running Inventory integration tests.
If you build Inventory with
maven clean install -Pitest
you can find a ready-to-run minimalistic Hawkular with just Inventory
and nothing else in
hawkular-inventory/hawkular-inventory-itest/target/hawkular-inventory-itest-*
directory.
The user "jdoe" with password "password" is there in the distro.
The distro uses the embedded Cassandra by default, that we tried to make
as resource-minimalistic as possible too.
If you still face the shortage of system resources with this distro (or
even when building it), you probably need to increase some of the ulimit
(linux/mac) settings. These are limits on my laptop:
[ppalaga@slama ~]$ ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 62872
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files (-n) 1024
pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8
POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
real-time priority (-r) 0
stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192
cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes (-u) 62872
virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks (-x) unlimited
Good luck,
-- Peter
1:26 a.m.
My laptop is macbook pro mid 2012, 8G ram, intel i5 2.5GHz.
I will try that. :)
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:53 PM Peter Palaga <ppalaga(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Austin, inline...
On 2016-05-27 05:29, Austin Kuo wrote:
> Hi all,
> I’m currently trying to report vertx instance to inventory, therefore I
> am doing some experiments that is communicating to the server with REST
> API. Wondering if there’s a way not to run an entire hawkular server
> (because i’m working on my laptop) but the inventory component alone?
Yes, that's exactly what we do when running Inventory integration tests.
If you build Inventory with
maven clean install -Pitest
you can find a ready-to-run minimalistic Hawkular with just Inventory
and nothing else in
hawkular-inventory/hawkular-inventory-itest/target/hawkular-inventory-itest-*
directory.
The user "jdoe" with password "password" is there in the distro.
The distro uses the embedded Cassandra by default, that we tried to make
as resource-minimalistic as possible too.
If you still face the shortage of system resources with this distro (or
even when building it), you probably need to increase some of the ulimit
(linux/mac) settings. These are limits on my laptop:
[ppalaga@slama ~]$ ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
pending signals (-i) 62872
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files (-n) 1024
pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8
POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
real-time priority (-r) 0
stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192
cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes (-u) 62872
virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
file locks (-x) unlimited
Good luck,
-- Peter
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
9:55 a.m.
With such a config you should have no issue building and running. You can
start working with an Inventory standalone build. But sooner or later we
will have to fix your Hawlular master build issue.
2016-05-28 1:26 GMT+02:00 Austin Kuo <auszon3(a)gmail.com>:
My laptop is macbook pro mid 2012, 8G ram, intel i5 2.5GHz.
I will try that. :)
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:53 PM Peter Palaga <ppalaga(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Austin, inline...
>
> On 2016-05-27 05:29, Austin Kuo wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I’m currently trying to report vertx instance to inventory, therefore I
> > am doing some experiments that is communicating to the server with REST
> > API. Wondering if there’s a way not to run an entire hawkular server
> > (because i’m working on my laptop) but the inventory component alone?
>
> Yes, that's exactly what we do when running Inventory integration tests.
>
> If you build Inventory with
>
> maven clean install -Pitest
>
> you can find a ready-to-run minimalistic Hawkular with just Inventory
> and nothing else in
>
> hawkular-inventory/hawkular-inventory-itest/target/hawkular-inventory-itest-*
> directory.
>
> The user "jdoe" with password "password" is there in the distro.
>
> The distro uses the embedded Cassandra by default, that we tried to make
> as resource-minimalistic as possible too.
>
> If you still face the shortage of system resources with this distro (or
> even when building it), you probably need to increase some of the ulimit
> (linux/mac) settings. These are limits on my laptop:
>
> [ppalaga@slama ~]$ ulimit -a
> core file size (blocks, -c) 0
> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
> scheduling priority (-e) 0
> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
> pending signals (-i) 62872
> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64
> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
> open files (-n) 1024
> pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8
> POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
> real-time priority (-r) 0
> stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192
> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
> max user processes (-u) 62872
> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
> file locks (-x) unlimited
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> -- Peter
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
--
Thomas Segismont
JBoss ON Engineering Team
2888
days inactive
2891
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Austin Kuo -
Peter Palaga -
Thomas Segismont