]
Gail Badner updated HHH-3338:
-----------------------------
Comment: was deleted
Order of attributes in generated SQL query is dependent on Java
version
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3338
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3338
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.6
Environment: WIndows XP, Java 5 Update 15, Java 6 update 5
Reporter: Michael Gerz
We use Hibernate Core 3.2.6 in combination with Derby 10.4.1.3.
When migrating from Java 5 to Java 6, we noticed a huge performance hit. Our analysis has
unveiled that Hibernate 3.2.6 produces semantical identical but syntactically different
queries for Java 5 and Java 6.
Java 5:
Hibernate: select logevent0_.ID as ID7_, logevent0_.INDEX_SENT as INDEX2_7_,
logevent0_.TEST_RUN_ID as TEST3_7_, logevent0_.SENDER as SENDER7_, logevent0_.TIME_SENT as
TIME5_7_, logevent0_.MESSAGE as MESSAGE8_, logevent0_.SEVERITY as SEVERITY8_,
logevent0_.SERIALIZED_CONTENT as SERIALIZED1_11_, logevent0_.RECEIVER as RECEIVER11_,
logevent0_.TIME_RECEIVED as TIME3_11_, logevent0_.INDEX_RECEIVED as INDEX4_11_,
logevent0_.ACTION_REQUEST as ACTION1_13_, logevent0_.ACTION_REPLY as ACTION1_14_,
logevent0_.clazz_ as clazz_ from ( select TEST_RUN_ID, SENDER, MESSAGE, SEVERITY,
nullif('x','x') as SERIALIZED_CONTENT, nullif('2000-1-1
00:00:00','2000-1-1 00:00:00') as TIME_RECEIVED, ID,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REQUEST, TIME_SENT,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REPLY, nullif('x','x') as
RECEIVER, nullif(0,0) as INDEX_RECEIVED, INDEX_SENT, 2 as clazz_ from USER_LOG_EVENT union
all select TEST_RUN_ID, SENDER, MESSAGE, SEVERITY, nullif('x','x') as
SERIALIZED_CONTENT, nullif('2000-1-1 00:00:00','2000-1-1 00:00:00') as
TIME_RECEIVED, ID, nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REQUEST, TIME_SENT,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REPLY, nullif('x','x') as
RECEIVER, nullif(0,0) as INDEX_RECEIVED, INDEX_SENT, 3 as clazz_ from DEVEL_LOG_EVENT
union all select TEST_RUN_ID, SENDER, nullif('x','x') as MESSAGE,
nullif('x','x') as SEVERITY, nullif('x','x') as
SERIALIZED_CONTENT, nullif('2000-1-1 00:00:00','2000-1-1 00:00:00') as
TIME_RECEIVED, ID, ACTION_REQUEST, TIME_SENT, nullif('x','x') as
ACTION_REPLY, nullif('x','x') as RECEIVER, nullif(0,0) as INDEX_RECEIVED,
INDEX_SENT, 6 as clazz_ from ACTION_REQUEST_LOG_EVENT union all select TEST_RUN_ID,
SENDER, nullif('x','x') as MESSAGE, nullif('x','x') as
SEVERITY, nullif('x','x') as SERIALIZED_CONTENT, nullif('2000-1-1
00:00:00','2000-1-1 00:00:00') as TIME_RECEIVED, ID,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REQUEST, TIME_SENT, ACTION_REPLY,
nullif('x','x') as RECEIVER, nullif(0,0) as INDEX_RECEIVED, INDEX_SENT, 7
as clazz_ from ACTION_REPLY_LOG_EVENT union all select TEST_RUN_ID, SENDER,
nullif('x','x') as MESSAGE, nullif('x','x') as SEVERITY,
SERIALIZED_CONTENT, TIME_RECEIVED, ID, nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REQUEST,
TIME_SENT, nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REPLY, RECEIVER, INDEX_RECEIVED,
INDEX_SENT, 4 as clazz_ from DATA_FLOW_LOG_EVENT ) logevent0_ where
logevent0_.TEST_RUN_ID=?
Java 6:
Hibernate: select logevent0_.ID as ID7_, logevent0_.INDEX_SENT as INDEX2_7_,
logevent0_.TEST_RUN_ID as TEST3_7_, logevent0_.SENDER as SENDER7_, logevent0_.TIME_SENT as
TIME5_7_, logevent0_.MESSAGE as MESSAGE8_, logevent0_.SEVERITY as SEVERITY8_,
logevent0_.SERIALIZED_CONTENT as SERIALIZED1_11_, logevent0_.RECEIVER as RECEIVER11_,
logevent0_.TIME_RECEIVED as TIME3_11_, logevent0_.INDEX_RECEIVED as INDEX4_11_,
logevent0_.ACTION_REQUEST as ACTION1_13_, logevent0_.ACTION_REPLY as ACTION1_14_,
logevent0_.clazz_ as clazz_ from ( select nullif('x','x') as RECEIVER,
TIME_SENT, SEVERITY, nullif('2000-1-1 00:00:00','2000-1-1 00:00:00') as
TIME_RECEIVED, ID, SENDER, MESSAGE, TEST_RUN_ID, nullif('x','x') as
SERIALIZED_CONTENT, INDEX_SENT, nullif(0,0) as INDEX_RECEIVED,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REQUEST, nullif('x','x') as
ACTION_REPLY, 2 as clazz_ from USER_LOG_EVENT union all select
nullif('x','x') as RECEIVER, TIME_SENT, SEVERITY, nullif('2000-1-1
00:00:00','2000-1-1 00:00:00') as TIME_RECEIVED, ID, SENDER, MESSAGE,
TEST_RUN_ID, nullif('x','x') as SERIALIZED_CONTENT, INDEX_SENT,
nullif(0,0) as INDEX_RECEIVED, nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REQUEST,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REPLY, 3 as clazz_ from DEVEL_LOG_EVENT union
all select nullif('x','x') as RECEIVER, TIME_SENT,
nullif('x','x') as SEVERITY, nullif('2000-1-1
00:00:00','2000-1-1 00:00:00') as TIME_RECEIVED, ID, SENDER,
nullif('x','x') as MESSAGE, TEST_RUN_ID, nullif('x','x')
as SERIALIZED_CONTENT, INDEX_SENT, nullif(0,0) as INDEX_RECEIVED, ACTION_REQUEST,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REPLY, 6 as clazz_ from ACTION_REQUEST_LOG_EVENT
union all select nullif('x','x') as RECEIVER, TIME_SENT,
nullif('x','x') as SEVERITY, nullif('2000-1-1
00:00:00','2000-1-1 00:00:00') as TIME_RECEIVED, ID, SENDER,
nullif('x','x') as MESSAGE, TEST_RUN_ID, nullif('x','x')
as SERIALIZED_CONTENT, INDEX_SENT, nullif(0,0) as INDEX_RECEIVED,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REQUEST, ACTION_REPLY, 7 as clazz_ from
ACTION_REPLY_LOG_EVENT union all select RECEIVER, TIME_SENT,
nullif('x','x') as SEVERITY, TIME_RECEIVED, ID, SENDER,
nullif('x','x') as MESSAGE, TEST_RUN_ID, SERIALIZED_CONTENT, INDEX_SENT,
INDEX_RECEIVED, nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REQUEST,
nullif('x','x') as ACTION_REPLY, 4 as clazz_ from DATA_FLOW_LOG_EVENT )
logevent0_ where logevent0_.TEST_RUN_ID=?
The first order (using Java 5) looks more reasonable, because TEST_RUN_ID is the first
column in all of the tables and it is also a foreign key.
The changed order of attributes does not really explain why Derby performs so poor on
Java 6 and we have already issued a report to the Derby community.
Nevertheless, the SQL queries generated Hibernate should not depend on a specific version
of Java. Maybe a compareTo() method is missing somewhere in the code...?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: