On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 2/4/2014 12:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> I've added Keycloak AS7 modules to UPS cart but not admin console. I
> believe
> that Keycloak is SaaS, so usage with two different carts reflect
> reality better.
> Configuring Keycloak cart once and let all other carts use is seems
> the right
> way to me.
>
>
> there is IMO pros and cons in both ways
>
Originally, Keycloak was going to be a SaaS. One internet service where
users could register and create their own Realms....But, we decided that
users will probably want to have full control of their security metadata
and not share a database with other users. Less we have to worry about
from a storage security standpoint.
IMO, UPS should support bundling its own keycloak server already
preconfigured, or, it should hook into an existing keycloak instance.
exactly - that also makes the user experience way better, running
everything in the cloud, OOTB
-M
I
don't know if this would require 2 different cartridges, or if you would
have an online "installation" UI to make these types of decisions.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf