Re: [keycloak-dev] sync/federation requirements/ideas

From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "Marek Posolda" <mposolda(a)redhat.com&gt;, keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 4:57:37 PM Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] sync/federation requirements/ideas What else is there after this? THere's nothing major left.

On 7/11/2014 11:21 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: > I'm happy to push for this if you think we can still deliver 1.0.final in a > reasonable time. > > Can we do this in stages? First split ModelProvider into RealmProvider and > UserProvider, update cache etc. Then start work on this in a branch? So we > can roll 1.0.final without it if it turns out to take to long to delivery? > > Would be good to have a Hangout again next week to discuss the next steps! > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt;, "Marek Posolda" >> <mposolda(a)redhat.com&gt; >> Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 3:12:41 PM >> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] sync/federation requirements/ideas >> >> >> On 7/11/2014 9:05 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: >>> This sounds like exactly what we need. There are quite a lot of kinks to >>> work out though. >>> >> >> My vote is we fix AuthProvider and sync now. Do another iteration. >> Users *really* want this. You're right, there's a lot of kinks we need >> to work out, but we don't want a large set of users we have to move off >> of an existing SPI. >> >> -- >> Bill Burke >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >> http://bill.burkecentral.com >> -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com