Re: [keycloak-dev] abstracting out picketlink

From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Wednesday, 31 July, 2013 1:00:19 PM Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] abstracting out picketlink Picketlink has gotten even more generic/abstract with the latest release. Every single API (User, Role, etc.) is now optional. Its more a federated JDO store than a IDM store now. Having dived into the code, I'm a little worried how its going to perform. On 7/31/2013 4:49 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: > Just a little smile ;) > > I think this is better in any case. IMO the IDM interfaces are to > generic/abstract to be consumed directly + they do change the API to > frequently. > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> Sent: Wednesday, 31 July, 2013 2:47:54 AM >> Subject: [keycloak-dev] abstracting out picketlink >> >> Don't laugh, I know I said I wasn't going to do this, but I am now. >> Abstracting out picketlink will make an easier transition for me to fit >> in the new version of Picketlink. Obviously it will also allow us to >> dump Picketlink too if it turns out its just not going to scale or they >> aren't accepting our pull requests. Hopefully we won't have to do that >> though. >> >> So merge from master often as I'll be committing as I go. >> >> -- >> Bill Burke >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >> http://bill.burkecentral.com >> _______________________________________________ >> keycloak-dev mailing list >> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >> -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hat http://bill.burkecentral.com