Re: [keycloak-dev] urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob always valid?

Not sure what you mean, but if you're asking if a login request can have '..?redirect_uri=urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob' without 'urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob' listed as a valid redirect_uri on the application/client, then no. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Tuesday, 20 May, 2014 4:32:06 PM > Subject: [keycloak-dev] urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob always valid? > > If the client has a redirect uri of urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob, this is > always acceptable? > > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > http://bill.burkecentral.com > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-dev mailing list > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev >