It would probably be a good idea although I think this JMS publishing is
such a basic feature that it should be part of the core package.
If you have a chance to help me get started with the Arquillian part, I'm
happy to send the PR. I should have time to work on this again within the
next week or so.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
I wonder if we should have a Keycloak extensions repository where we
place things like this rather than adding directly to master.
On 31 March 2016 at 20:18, Thomas Raehalme <
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Thomas Darimont <
> thomas.darimont(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>> would you mind sharing your keycloak configuration with a JMS
> Here are the changes I made to standalone/configuration/standalone.xml:
> 1. Added the following extension under /server/extensions:
> <extension module="org.wildfly.extension.messaging-activemq"/>
> 2. Added the following subsystem under /server/profile:
> <subsystem xmlns="urn:jboss:domain:messaging-activemq:1.0">
> <server name="default">
> <security enabled="false" /> <!-- I didn't need to use
> as everything was localhost -->
> <remote-acceptor name="netty"
> <remote-connector name="netty"
> <in-vm-acceptor name="in-vm" server-id="0"/>
> <in-vm-connector name="in-vm" server-id="0"/>
> <pooled-connection-factory name="activemq-ra"
> transaction="xa" connectors="in-vm"
> entries="java:/ConnectionFactory java:/JmsXA
> <jms-topic name="KeycloakEvents"
> java:jboss/exported/jms/KeycloakEvents" />
> 3. Added the following socket-binding under /server/socket-binding-group:
> <socket-binding name="messaging" port="61616"/>
> This enabled my external process to listen to the JMS topic.
> I attached a full example to this message. The changes have been marked
> with <!-- keycloak-events-jms -->.
> Did you manage to configure a new resource-adapter via jboss-cli?
> No, I haven't used jboss-cli but modified the configuration file directly.
> My implementation of KEYCLOAK-2302 can be found at Github:
> I have not sent a PR as I have yet to complete the Arquillian integration
> tests requested by Stian. Other work has kept me busy and I haven't had a
> chance to even rebase against 1.9.x.
> Best regards,
> keycloak-dev mailing list