Re: [keycloak-dev] Default roles for realms and applications
Not sure, I think I would use a group personally, at least in most cases - but I wonder
whether or not there are people that would just use roles (and not groups). Doesn't
hurt to have both just in case?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, 16 August, 2013 1:06:05 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Default roles for realms and applications
I don't know. IMO, wouldn't you assign a group to be the default for
registration?
On 8/16/2013 4:01 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> Would we have default groups as an alternative to default roles, or as well
> as?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
>> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 15 August, 2013 8:42:09 PM
>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Default roles for realms and applications
>>
>> We'll eventually want Groups, which are collections of roles you can
>> assing to a user.
>>
>> On 8/15/2013 11:36 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>> I've added default roles to realms. Basically it's a list of roles
that
>>> are
>>> assigned to users that self-register (either through registration form or
>>> social login).
>>>
>>> We need the same for applications as well. I assume in this case when a
>>> new
>>> user is registered we would list all applications for the realm, and add
>>> the default roles for the user to each application?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com