----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, 12 March, 2015 1:57:21 PM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] 1.2.beta1 planning, need you to defer things
On 3/12/2015 1:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> I'd like to reopen KEYCLOAK-311 as IMO it's not solved. This is not
> referring to the claim mapping work you've done, it's something else.
>
I opened two jiras. One, a "claim validation" jira and another
broker->Usermodel mappers. That should have covered what 311 is not doing.
Not IMO. We really need to have something that defines how the internal user profile looks
like, attribute validation, what attributes are required, etc.. Also, I really don't
think we should require users to modify registration screens and admin console if all they
want to do is for example to add a DOB field.
> Before we can do a release we need to make sure that database migration
> works (I know they don't atm as social providers and social links are
> lost). We also need to add transformation of JSON exports and
> representations so older versions can be imported into 1.2.0.Beta1.
>
Not sure, but json imports from older versions should be backwards
compatible. We're just doing migrations via json export/import right?
No, we migrate the database directly.
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/misc/UpdatingDatabaseSch...
>>
>> I'm going to try and close existing bugs and implement features needed
>> for
jboss.org guys over the next 2 weeks as well as test out master to
>> make sure things still work.
>
> With regards to
jboss.org guys we shouldn't just add features because they
> request it. Take for example KEYCLOAK-1045, which was easily solved with
> we already have. Another one is KEYCLOAK-1051, which I think is a horrible
> idea.
>
I don't want to just add features either, but some of their things are
valid...i.e. finding out if a user is logged and who they are without
doing all the token stuff.
That's exactly one of the things that are not necessary, I've added a POC that
uses keycloak.js, which they where happy with. See KEYCLOAK-1045 and
http://stianst.github.io/jbossorg/index.html.
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com