I think you forgot to add Michal in CC (or perhaps you did BCC?)
Due to the way to review and merge changes to Keycloak we can not accept
direct commits to the repository. All changes have to be made through PRs.
What would be very cool is if Weblate would support GitHub flow that
enabled it to send PRs including comments and links to view the reviews of
the translations easily.
I don't think we can expect all contributions to come through Weblate and
will still need to be able to accept translations coming directly as a PR.
With that in mind and also just the fact that it would be rather awkward I
don't like the idea of syncing the changes.
The short term solution would be to setup Weblate with webhooks so it
receives automatic updates, but still require changes to be done by sending
a PR. Not sure if Weblate would support committing to a users fork rather
than to the upstream repo.
A longer term solution may be to consider extracting the translations
completely into a separate repository and have separate releases for
translations that are installed into Keycloak rather than bundled with
Keycloak itself. One issue here though is that the English main translation
would have to remain in the Keycloak repository. Not really sure about this
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 11:13, Eugen Stan <ieugen(a)netdava.com> wrote:
I've added Michal to CC (creator of Weblate) and I hope he can pitch in.
I think the best thing is to go through the very good documentation on
continuous translation and translation workflows :
Weblate has some features that can help with batching: lazy commits
(commit once a day) and has some customization options on how to
interact with the repository.
I believe with the Review workflow, Weblate does not commit to git until
the translation has been approved so this might work well. However it
will require a translator and a reviewer.
From our experience working with translators on apps - they need context
and they need to see the translations in the app for them to figure out
the best translation.
So most of the time we ended up doing the translation - best effort +
deploy + review in the app and update the texts.
It also helps to have a single or just a few translators or a glossary
to keep the translation consistent. Like in code, there are multiple
ways of translating a string and like developers, translators or end
users don't always agree on the result.
To have an idea on how the translation commits look, please see here
You will see why we want to choose another git repo for this - which is
still my recommendation - it works very well, and it is simple. We had
commits every 24h.
Another option is to keep the translations in another git repo (working
repo) and manually merge them in keycloak (source) - there you control
the frequency and you can merge just one language. This requires a bit
of manual work but if it is done once a month it is ok I guess.
La 05.02.2019 11:47, Stian Thorgersen a scris:
> Can you briefly describe how it works?
> With regards to repository and commits we can't use anything that
> commits directly to the repository. We need something where updates to
> a single language can be batched and sent as a PR with a single commit.
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 09:46, Eugen Stan <ieugen(a)netdava.com
> <mailto:email@example.com>> wrote:
> Hello Stian,
> Weblate can wrok with the respository as is but it can introduce a
> of noise for the commits related to translation. That is why we
> chose to
> split the translations into another module.
> In our case we have quite a few languages and a lot of text to be
> translated so there is a lot of noise commming as git commits from
> In keycloak I believe this will not matter that much since it has
> text to be translated.
> Weblate has the feature to implement translators + reviewers
> It can also work with offline translation.
> We had a very good experience with it so far. Michal (the creator of
> weblate) has proven very responsive and helpful even when we did
> not pay
> for maintenance. In our case we ended up paying for maintenance
> it is worth it.
> For keycloak we have the following languages translated for all
> components (except Admin) with professional translators or local
> Arabic, Dutch, English Australia, English UK, Latvian, Lithuanian,
> Norwegian, Romanian, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Vietnamese and
> more are
> I think the setup can be done in a day or so.
> La 05.02.2019 08:16, Stian Thorgersen a scris:
> > I'm afraid using sub modules is not an option for us.
> > I'm open to a tool to aid with translation, but we would need to
> > review what tools are available before selecting one. The tool
> > have to be free for Open Source projects and self-hosting is not an
> > option. It would also have to work with the repository as is and
> > require changes to where and how the translations are maintained.
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 14:41, Eugen Stan <ieugen(a)netdava.com
> > <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:email@example.com>>>
> > Bump.
> > Hello again. We managed to translate some languages already
> and we
> > would
> > like to contribute the translations upstream and hopefully
> improve the
> > translation process.
> > We have some feedback from our process. We use this process
> > and the idea is to have it working for keycloak open source
> > Proposal for Keycloak
> > - We propose to move the community translations in a
> separate git
> > project - just with the translations
> > - That repository is going to be used by Weblate as a source of
> > translations ( use Free Hosted Weblate -
> > https://hosted.weblate.org/
> > - The translations project can be added as a git sub module
> to the
> > keycloak project
> > - during build the translations can be copied to the final
> > We do this allready and we can help with the code
> migrations. Having
> > this setup will improve the contributions to translations
> and also the
> > ability to change the translations easily.
> > WDYT?
> > Regards,
> > Eugen
> > La 01.12.2018 19:22, Eugen Stan a scris:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Where can we find the translation files for Keycloak and
> what is the
> > > process for upstreaming them?
> > >
> > > We are planning to deploy Keycloak for authentication for our
> > services.
> > > We have users all accross the globe and we have
> translators that
> > we can
> > > ask to translate.
> > >
> > > I'm planning to push the translations upstream once they are
> > done (need
> > > to get approbal on this).
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Eugen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev