I don't know. IMO, wouldn't you assign a group to be the default for
registration?
On 8/16/2013 4:01 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Would we have default groups as an alternative to default roles, or
as well as?
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, 15 August, 2013 8:42:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Default roles for realms and applications
>
> We'll eventually want Groups, which are collections of roles you can
> assing to a user.
>
> On 8/15/2013 11:36 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> I've added default roles to realms. Basically it's a list of roles that
are
>> assigned to users that self-register (either through registration form or
>> social login).
>>
>> We need the same for applications as well. I assume in this case when a new
>> user is registered we would list all applications for the realm, and add
>> the default roles for the user to each application?
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>
http://bill.burkecentral.com
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>