I wouldn't think it is. OpenID Connect usually is '.../userinfo'. As long
as '/me' returns json you can use mappers to do whatever you'd like though.
On 19 January 2016 at 12:22, Vlastimil Elias <velias(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 19.1.2016 12:09, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
On 19 January 2016 at 12:06, Vlastimil Elias < <velias(a)redhat.com>
velias(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 19.1.2016 11:52, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>
> If you can get it in today or tomorrow (early) we can add it to 1.8.0.CR2.
>
>
> will try to do this, I will provide PR against branche and the another
> against master
>
> You should also be able to use the generic OpenID Connect provider.
>
>
> I though about it, but if I understand it correctly I will not be able to
> get users name, surname and email this way, as it is not provided in OAuth
> 2 and it requires another REST call in common social providers.
>
Do they not have an userinfo endpoint?
They have some REST endpoint at /me path, see doc at
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh826534.aspx
But I'm not sure if it match some standard or rules so generic OpenID
Connect provider can use it. What is format for UserInfo endpoint to be
useful for this provider? Keycloak documentation do not provide any useful
info about requirements for this URL (eg link to some specification).
Vlastimil
>
>
>
> Adding it yourself would require also adding templates in admin theme,
> shouldn't be a big deal as you only need that one template and the rest
> you'd inherit from Keycloak theme.
>
>
> I see
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On 19 January 2016 at 11:10, Vlastimil Elias < <velias(a)redhat.com>
> velias(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need Social login provider for Microsoft Live account. I can implement
>> it as I did few other social login providers already.
>>
>> Problem is that I need it in Keycloak 1.8. Any chance to add it to 1.8
>> if I will be quick enough (PR today or tomorrow)? It is OAuth2 based
>> provider so impl should be easy.
>>
>> If not in KC 1.8 release, is it possible to add social provider as
>> customization to my KC instance only? It is common provider factory so
>> it should be possible I hope, but it also requires some template in
>> admin theme, so I'm not sure (probably I have to create my customized
>> admin theme in this case).
>>
>> I definitely prefer to have it in upstream if possible.
>>
>> Vlastimil
>>
>> --
>> Vlastimil Elias
>> Principal Software Engineer
>> Developer Portal Engineering Team
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> Vlastimil Elias
> Principal Software Engineer
> Developer Portal Engineering Team
>
>
--
Vlastimil Elias
Principal Software Engineer
Developer Portal Engineering Team