On 10/31/2014 7:55 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>> Stan, can we get rid of these:
>> 08:30:02,004 WARN [org.jboss.as.dependency.private] (MSC service thread
>> 1-8) JBAS018567: Deployment "deployment.main-auth-server.war" is
using
>> a private module ...
> I don't think that's related to my PR. I think you'll see those when
> you deploy from the /deployments directory as well.
>
> The messages are for the jackson and httpcomponents modules. I think I
> can get rid of the messages if we remove the <dependencies> section from
> jboss-deployment-structure.xml. Those dependencies should be added using
> KeycloakDependencyProcessor instead.
Yes, it's not caused by your PR (I should have clarified that), was just hoping there
was some magic we could do in the subsystem to get rid of those.
Removing dependencies section would brake it when deployed as WAR though. Can you modify
the dependencies in the deployment-process instead?
It would only brake when the
Keycloak subsystem is not installed. You
can still deploy as a WAR. Don't we require that anyway on WildFly/EAP
deployments?
The other thing we could do is to install our own versions of
httpcomponents and jackson.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Stan Silvert" <ssilvert(a)redhat.com>
>>> Cc: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 29 October, 2014 3:56:18 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Notes on KEYCLOAK-795: Move Auth Server into
>>> KC subsystem
>>>
>>> I'd like to have a look at this before we merge it, but won't have
time
>>> until
>>> tomorrow (maybe Friday).
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Stan Silvert" <ssilvert(a)redhat.com>
>>>> To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 29 October, 2014 3:25:55 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Notes on KEYCLOAK-795: Move Auth Server into
>>>> KC
>>>> subsystem
>>>>
>>>> On 10/29/2014 10:07 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
>>>>> On 10/29/2014 9:28 AM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>>>>>> * EAP6 does not yet support all this. We should discuss
whether or
>>>>>> not this functionality should be backported.
>>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for this, but maybe some focus should be on getting a more
seamless
>>>>> "hello world" like we discussed in a previous thread?
>>>>>
>>>> I agree. IMO, the next step should be Feature Pack installation and the
>>>> seamless "hello world". Then we look at EAP6.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>>
>