Re: [keycloak-dev] Spring Security for Keycloak Contribution
Hi,
There are two different approaches here. The project I mentioned still relies on a
Keycloak adapter being present in the servlet container. It’s not quite the final product
I need but it would be useful to people who can declare their protected resources in
web.xml.
What I’m working on now is a Keycloak adapter-less Spring Security integration. Basically,
it’s a Keycloak Spring Security Adapter that can stand on it’s own and protect resources
based on the Spring Security configuration. It’s this latter implementation that I believe
has the most value.
Question for you: Do you want to see both approaches covered or is one approach more in
line with the Keycloak project’s goals?
In my option, the latter, Keycloak Spring Security Adapter, is of more value, but please
let me know your thoughts.
Thanks in advance,
Scott
On Apr 16, 2015, at 9:24 AM, Stian Thorgersen
<stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
If you can prepare a PR for it that'd be great. Please add a
'spring-security' module within the integration module where all the other
adapters live. Also, to create a distribution archive for the adapter please add a module
inside distribution that packages it up (look at existing modules there for a reference).
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Rossillo" <srossillo(a)smartling.com>
> To: "keycloak-dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 3:08:13 PM
> Subject: [keycloak-dev] Spring Security for Keycloak Contribution
>
> Good morning,
>
> As I mentioned a few days ago on the users mailing list, we developed an
> integration between the Keycloak Adapter and Spring Security. The
> announcement can be found here:
>
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/2015-April/001992.html
>
> The code is here:
> http://smartling.github.io/spring-security-keycloak/
> Would you be interested in either:
> 1. Us contributing the code to the Keycloak project or
> 2. You integrating the code into the Keycloak project
>
> We released the code under the Apache 2.0 license to be compatible with the
> Keycloak project. Let me know your thoughts.
> Best,
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev