Re: [keycloak-dev] Build on top of Vert.x?
Interesting idea, especially with regards to providers. In general we really do need to
improve on how providers are written and configured.
We shouldn't forget about JEE either though. JEE has a lot to offer application
developers that Vert.x doesn't.
Not convinced we should rewrite Keycloak to run on Vert.x. Instead I'd say we should
provide hooks into Vert.x and other containers (JEE) to allow users to write providers in
whatever they want.
The #1 thing to think about for Keycloak 2.0 IMO is customization. What parts should be
customizable and how do we best allow users to do that?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Burke" <bburke(a)redhat.com>
To: keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Thursday, 8 January, 2015 1:44:01 AM
Subject: [keycloak-dev] Build on top of Vert.x?
Don't care that much at all about AIO, but what is compelling to me
about Vert.x is that it is a polyglot platform. If our SPIs could be
written in any language and deployed easily this would be a huge win and
could potential bring together very diverse communities (node.js and
linux-python-admins).
Something to think about for Keycloak 2.0.
Bill
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev