Using keycloak 1.9.1, we use an external identity broker which uses SAML (the dutch
government). Now we would like to use the saml implementation in keycloak. For this to
function, we need to call our provider with a SAML request containing a specific entityID
("urn:nl:eherkenning:DV:00000003123456780000:entities:9999") instead of
getEntityId(uriInfo, realm) as currently used in the SAMLIdentityProvider. Now my question
is two-fold. Is there any reason why the entityId is as specified as of speaking and
secondly, am I correct in stating that the only way to change this behavior would be to
provide a selfwritten different identity broker? Or would a (selfwritten) patch be
sufficient to provide this as an optional parameter to the current SAMLIdentityProvider?
This message is subject to the following E-mail Disclaimer.
) CRV Holding B.V. seats according to the
articles of association in Arnhem, Dutch trade number 09125050.