5:38 a.m.
It helped us to for getting the UPS integration running.
I used it basically as a 'simple way' to describe error, instead of having
to mess around w/ UPS, as things are reproducable w/ the KC src base (e.g.
KEYCLOAK-556 );
But if you have strong feelings around deleting it, go for it
-Matthias
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Can we delete project-integrations/aerogear-ups, or do we still need
it?
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
7:35 a.m.
No strong feelings, just checking if it's actually still in use, so if you still use
it we'll keep it ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org>
To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 10:38:37 AM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Do we still need project-integrations/aerogear-ups
It helped us to for getting the UPS integration running.
I used it basically as a 'simple way' to describe error, instead of having
to mess around w/ UPS, as things are reproducable w/ the KC src base (e.g.
KEYCLOAK-556 );
But if you have strong feelings around deleting it, go for it
-Matthias
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Can we delete project-integrations/aerogear-ups, or do we still need it?
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
9:08 a.m.
I think reproducing the mentioned issue was easier w that example. Perhaps
for you on fixing/testing as well.
But there is IMO no real need for it. Just a convenience
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
No strong feelings, just checking if it's actually still in use,
so if you
still use it we'll keep it ;)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 10:38:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Do we still need
project-integrations/aerogear-ups
>
> It helped us to for getting the UPS integration running.
>
> I used it basically as a 'simple way' to describe error, instead of
having
> to mess around w/ UPS, as things are reproducable w/ the KC src base
(e.g.
> KEYCLOAK-556 );
> But if you have strong feelings around deleting it, go for it
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> > Can we delete project-integrations/aerogear-ups, or do we still need
it?
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
10:09 a.m.
We need to update it I believe! :)
On 7/11/2014 7:35 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
No strong feelings, just checking if it's actually still in use,
so if you still use it we'll keep it ;)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 10:38:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Do we still need project-integrations/aerogear-ups
>
> It helped us to for getting the UPS integration running.
>
> I used it basically as a 'simple way' to describe error, instead of having
> to mess around w/ UPS, as things are reproducable w/ the KC src base (e.g.
> KEYCLOAK-556 );
> But if you have strong feelings around deleting it, go for it
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we delete project-integrations/aerogear-ups, or do we still need it?
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com
3575
days inactive
3575
days old
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Bill Burke -
Matthias Wessendorf -
Stian Thorgersen