I'd say go ahead and rename, but add a note in the migration docs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stan Silvert" <ssilvert(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, 24 November, 2014 1:57:28 AM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Rename WildFly subsystem
On 11/21/2014 3:24 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
> This is the adapter? How can you merge the two when one uses undertow
> and the other uses jbossweb?
I load a different dependency processor and deployment processor
depending on the platform. Other than that, the rest of the subsystem
can share a common code base.
> On 11/21/2014 1:49 PM, Stan Silvert wrote:
>> I've merged the code bases so that we just have a single subsystem for
>> both WildFly and EAP/AS7. Working great on both (yay!).
>> So the EAP subsystem will be removed from the code base and I now just
>> have the WildFly subsystem that works for both.
>> Can anyone think of a reason why I shouldn't rename this to
>> "keycloak-subsystem" instead of
"keycloak-wildfly-subsystem"? The only
>> problem I can think of is that it will break existing user's
>> standalone.xml files that refer to the old name.||
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev mailing list