Re: [keycloak-user] To LDAP or NOT?

You can plug LDAP into Keycloak as user federation provider (See Keycloak docs), but still Keycloak also needs to store users in it's internal database. That's because Keycloak has various user's internal metadata specific to it's logic. So usually just some parts of user are stored in LDAP (you can control with LDAP mappers what exactly), but all the other stuff is used in Keycloak database. Integrating Keycloak with LDAP is useful especially in case that you have: - Existing user base stored in LDAP - Other systems or applications, which are compatible with LDAP and needs to read user informations from there If none of those is applicable for you, then it's best to skip LDAP and just use Keycloak internal database. There is no need to store info about user accounts in 2 places if there is no reason for that. Marek On 22/12/15 14:51, Christopher Wallace wrote: We are building a new application with RBAC Security Model, we always attempt to use as much COTs functionality of our technology stack as possible. We are working with 1.7 version of KEYCLOAK for SSO (Thank you for this product by the way) We are at a decision point of where to persist our users, roles and permissions. We considered LDAP, but then with the introduction of composite roles into KEYCLOAK there was consolidation could we support users and roles directly in KEYCLOAK and permissions in our datastore. My question to the group what is the best practice? Is there value in having the additional LDAP user repository? Most places my experience is there is both LDAP or AD and SSO I wanted to keep the email fairly short, but if you have additional questions please feel free. Thank You! _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing listkeycloak-user@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user