Re: [keycloak-user] Naming of the keycloak proxy/generic adapter

KeyCloak OIDC Generic Adapter - KOGA ? :) Kevin ________________________________________ From: keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] on behalf of John Doyle [jdoyle(a)redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 7:28 AM To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: [keycloak-user] Naming of the keycloak proxy/generic adapter We've begun calling the keycloak proxy the generic adapter. I think this is a good move, there's too many proxies. My concern with 'generic adapter' is that it's not specific enough. Users could be justified in thinking that they can proxy SAML with it in addition to OIDC. I propose that we included OIDC in the name to make it clear. Some Possibilities: OIDC Adapter Generic OIDC Adapter Universal OIDC Adapter Standalone OIDC Adapter Other ideas or preferences? ~jd _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user