Re: [keycloak-user] To LDAP or NOT?
You can plug LDAP into Keycloak as user federation provider (See
Keycloak docs), but still Keycloak also needs to store users in it's
internal database. That's because Keycloak has various user's internal
metadata specific to it's logic. So usually just some parts of user are
stored in LDAP (you can control with LDAP mappers what exactly), but all
the other stuff is used in Keycloak database.
Integrating Keycloak with LDAP is useful especially in case that you have:
- Existing user base stored in LDAP
- Other systems or applications, which are compatible with LDAP and
needs to read user informations from there
If none of those is applicable for you, then it's best to skip LDAP and
just use Keycloak internal database. There is no need to store info
about user accounts in 2 places if there is no reason for that.
Marek
On 22/12/15 14:51, Christopher Wallace wrote:
We are building a new application with RBAC Security Model, we always
attempt to use as much COTs functionality of our technology stack as
possible. We are working with 1.7 version of KEYCLOAK for SSO (Thank
you for this product by the way) We are at a decision point of where
to persist our users, roles and permissions. We considered LDAP, but
then with the introduction of composite roles into KEYCLOAK there was
consolidation could we support users and roles directly in KEYCLOAK
and permissions in our datastore. My question to the group what is the
best practice? Is there value in having the additional LDAP user
repository? Most places my experience is there is both LDAP or AD and
SSO I wanted to keep the email fairly short, but if you have
additional questions please feel free.
Thank You!
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.8 KB)