Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js

From: "Joshua Bellamy-Henn" <josh(a)psidox.com&gt; To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com&gt;, keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2014 9:13:21 PM Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js So I've tried to register this package for you guys using bower: ~/play/keycloak-js-bower master 14:08:22 $ bower register keycloak git://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git bower keycloak#* resolve git:// github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#* bower keycloak#* checkout master bower keycloak#* resolved git:// github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git#923dccb251 [?] Registering a package will make it installable via the registry ( https://bower.herokuapp.com), continue? Yes bower keycloak register git:// github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower.git bower EUNKNOWN Unknown error: 403 I am afraid this could be due to the version number possibly being in an incorrect format. On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joshua Bellamy-Henn <josh(a)psidox.com&gt; wrote: > I removed the "keycloak" package, the name should be open for registration > now. > > Still bit skeptical it will accept anything other than "x.x.x" notation > for versioning but give it a try. :) > > - Josh > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Have you contacted the Bower guys to get this changed yet? >> >> By the way we're going to stick with the same versioning that we use for >> Keycloak except we'll remove -final from the final release. So versions >> would be: >> >> 1.0-beta4 >> 1.0-rc1 >> 1.0 >> >> That should mean that versions such as ">=1.0" will work, and will only >> use stable versions, while if someone wants to use a beta or rc they can >> explicitly specify the version. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com&gt; >> > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; >> > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org >> > Sent: Thursday, 3 July, 2014 4:46:09 PM >> > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js >> > >> > I do think there is a problem using that version format, I think I >> tried it >> > originally and bower was having none of it. This could be because they >> use >> > version for auto upgrade purposes, where one can use a "~" character to >> > prefix the version to allow upgrades in version minors in the bower.json >> > file. >> > >> > eg. >> > "dependencies": { >> > "keycloak": "~0.3.12" >> > }, >> > >> > >> > I have to admit I've been pulled to the dark side a little bit, it do >> enjoy >> > npm / bower for doing javascript type build processes (sometimes a >> > necessary evil). I was never a a fan of 'grunt' but found that 'gulp' >> is >> > much better. I have a hybrid build process in my java apps where I >> > sometimes break out of maven to execute some gulp build processes. >> > >> > But I understand for project like keycloak 'npm / gulp' adds a lot of >> > complexity to build process and is not desirable. >> > >> > I'll talk to the bower guys to get keycloak switched over to your fork >> :D >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Stian Thorgersen <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> > >> > > I've pulled in your stuff to >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-js-bower >> > > >> > > I'd prefer the versions to match with Keycloak versions (1.0-beta-2, >> > > 1.0-beta-3, 1.0-final). Do you know if that'll be a problem? >> > > >> > > Also, I'm going to add minification of keycloak.js to our Maven build. >> > > We'll need it there as well + we're mainly Java/Maven guys ;) >> > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com&gt; >> > > > To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian(a)redhat.com&gt; >> > > > Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > > Sent: Monday, 23 June, 2014 10:38:44 PM >> > > > Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js >> > > > >> > > > Looks like it's a manual process at the moment to get registry >> moved to a >> > > > different github endpont. Let me know when you have the project >> setup >> > > and >> > > > I'll contact the bower guys. >> > > > >> > > > - Josh >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Josh <smysnk(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > You bet, I actually had the thought that it would be better as >> part of >> > > the >> > > > > release cycle. I'll have to figure out how to transfer bower >> > > repositories >> > > > > because there was no login required to register a bower repo and >> > > currently >> > > > > I have taken "keycloak" which would be optimal for the project. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Stian Thorgersen < >> stian(a)redhat.com&gt; >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Hi Josh, >> > > > >> >> > > > >> That's great - thanks for contributing this. I would like to >> transfer >> > > > >> this to https://github.com/keycloak though, I hope your happy >> with >> > > that. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Thanks, >> > > > >> Stian >> > > > >> >> > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > > > >> > From: "Josh" <smysnk(a)gmail.com&gt; >> > > > >> > To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > > >> > Sent: Friday, 20 June, 2014 6:30:02 PM >> > > > >> > Subject: [keycloak-user] Bower for keycloak.js >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Hi guys, >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > I have created a little github project to make keycloak.js >> > > available to >> > > > >> bower >> > > > >> > package manager . >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Project here: >> > > > >> > https://github.com/smysnk/keycloak-adapter-bower >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > Usage: >> > > > >> > $ bower install keycloak >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > - Josh >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > > > >> > keycloak-user mailing list >> > > > >> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >