Re: [keycloak-user] Naming of the keycloak proxy/generic adapter
My vote goes to OIDC Adapter. It just supports OIDC, that's what the name says. I
don't think adding something like "generic" adds meaningful information. The
shorter, the better... :)
Best regards,
Sebastian
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Dr.-Ing. Sebastian Schuster
Engineering and Support (INST/ESY1)
Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Ullsteinstr. 128 | 12109 Berlin | GERMANY |
www.bosch-si.com
Tel. +49 30 726112-485 | Fax +49 30 726112-100 | Sebastian.Schuster(a)bosch-si.com
Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke; Geschäftsführung: Dr. Stefan Ferber,
Michael Hahn
-----Original Message-----
From: keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org <keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org>
On Behalf Of John Doyle
Sent: Mittwoch, 15. August 2018 16:29
To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [keycloak-user] Naming of the keycloak proxy/generic adapter
We've begun calling the keycloak proxy the generic adapter. I think this is a good
move, there's too many proxies. My concern with 'generic adapter' is that
it's not specific enough. Users could be justified in thinking that they can proxy
SAML with it in addition to OIDC. I propose that we included OIDC in the name to make it
clear.
Some Possibilities:
OIDC Adapter
Generic OIDC Adapter
Universal OIDC Adapter
Standalone OIDC Adapter
Other ideas or preferences?
~jd
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user