Yes I filed jira tickets. they have been sitting around for a while.
kcinit does seem quite important if you want to use keycloak for kubernetes authentication
and want to support the command line. It is troubling to hear it is not going to be a
focus for a year. Maybe its because openshift would use it in a slightly different way
then vanilla k8s would. But since keycloak is trying to become part of the cncf, that
would be an important thing to support I think. I am trying to use keycloak with a vanilla
kubernetes and support both the cli and the web ui securely.
I might be willing to contribute to it too if that would help move things along. Its been
unclear though that such contributions would be welcome?
Thanks,
Kevin
________________________________
From: Stian Thorgersen [sthorger(a)redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2019 6:18 AM
To: Bruno Oliveira
Cc: Fox, Kevin M; keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] kcinit status
kcinit is in a prototype stage and is not released or documented as it's not ready for
use. From our priorities lists it's doubtful that much will happen with this tool this
year.
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 14:41, Bruno Oliveira
<bruno@abstractj.org<mailto:bruno@abstractj.org>> wrote:
Hi Kevin, did you file Jiras for the bugs you mentioned? If not please
do, and also make sure to add all the details needed to reproduce the
issue.
On 2018-12-21, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
Not much has happened with kcinit in a long time and it has a few
outstanding bugs in the way of working for us. What is the status of the project?
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org<mailto:keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
--
abstractj
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org<mailto:keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user