My vote goes to OIDC Adapter. It just supports OIDC, that's what the name says. I don't think adding something like "generic" adds meaningful information. The shorter, the better... :) Best regards, Sebastian Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Dr.-Ing. Sebastian Schuster Engineering and Support (INST/ESY1) Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Ullsteinstr. 128 | 12109 Berlin | GERMANY | www.bosch-si.com Tel. +49 30 726112-485 | Fax +49 30 726112-100 | Sebastian.Schuster(a)bosch-si.com Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke; Geschäftsführung: Dr. Stefan Ferber, Michael Hahn -----Original Message----- From: keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org < keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; On Behalf Of John Doyle Sent: Mittwoch, 15. August 2018 16:29 To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: [keycloak-user] Naming of the keycloak proxy/generic adapter We've begun calling the keycloak proxy the generic adapter. I think this is a good move, there's too many proxies. My concern with 'generic adapter' is that it's not specific enough. Users could be justified in thinking that they can proxy SAML with it in addition to OIDC. I propose that we included OIDC in the name to make it clear. Some Possibilities: OIDC Adapter Generic OIDC Adapter Universal OIDC Adapter Standalone OIDC Adapter Other ideas or preferences? ~jd _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user