Am I understand correctly that your application wants to talk with Keycloak through SAML protocol? If yes, then SAML Identity provider is not something for your usecase. SAML Identity provider is useful for the opposite case (for example: your application wants to talk OIDC with Keycloak, and Keycloak itself will then use SAML Identity provider to redirect to some other 3rd party SAML IDP. So defacto Keycloak acts as "bridge" between OIDC App and external SAML IDP in that case). For your case, you may need regular SAML adapters. Take a look at keycloak-examples under directory "saml" and at the docs http://keycloak.github.io/docs/userguide/saml-client-adapter/html/index.html If your "consumer" application wants to use SAML and you want Keycloak to use SAML and act as "bridge" then you may need both SAML adapter and SAML Identity provider. Marek On 01/06/16 17:08, Marque Davis wrote: > Hi, > > I’m working on moving SAML auth in one app into Keycloak. Since we > have many clients hitting our existing API, we don’t want to change > the external API. Instead we need to proxy through to Keycloak. I > have a SAML test harness that generates the SAML doc and redirects to > KC, but I constantly get a staleCodeError int he logs and the > following error on the page it redirects to. > > WE'RE SORRY ... > This page is no longer valid, please go back to your application and > login again > > I’ve setup an Identity Provider named “saml” and pointed my test app > to the Redirect URI > (http://192.168.99.100:10080/auth/realms/demo/broker/saml/endpoint). > Config screenshot attached (if it isn’t stripped from email) > > Am I doing something wrong, or is this just not a use case Keycloak > is designed for? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-user mailing list > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user