Force token refresh with the Spring Security adapter
by Aritz Maeztu
I'm using keycloak in a java client, configured with the Spring Security
adapter.
I've got a custom mapper in my keycloak configuration, so when the
access token is refreshed, keycloak accesses an endpoint to retrieve
some user permissions and they're stored in the token itself. Later on,
my client application checks the token without having to perform the
access to the permission endpoint itself (increased performance).
However, when an admin user changes his own permissions, I would like
the keycloak adapter to refresh the token after the permissions are
stored, this way the admin user is not required to have its token
refreshed or to re-login to load his new permissions.
Is there a way to achieve it? Some kind of operation to refresh current
session's token?
--
Aritz Maeztu Otaño
Departamento Desarrollo de Software
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/aritz-maeztu-ota%C3%B1o-65891942>
<http://www.tesicnor.com>
Pol. Ind. Mocholi. C/Rio Elorz, Nave 13E 31110 Noain (Navarra)
Telf. Aritz Maeztu: 948 68 03 06
Telf. Secretaría: 948 21 40 40
Antes de imprimir este e-mail piense bien si es necesario hacerlo: El
medioambiente es cosa de todos.
6 years, 11 months
programmatic authentication flow
by Steve Favez
Hi all,
I'd like to implement the following use case. I need a Browser
authentication flow that will add, after User / Password Form
Authenticator, a kind of "access rules" authenticator, that will, according
to some request parameters, (for example, ip address, or application) will
add dynamically a second factor authenticator in the flow. (Like OTP or
SMS).
Furthermore, I'd like to be able to provide a choice of 2FA systems to the
end user (For example, we provide a set of second factory, and the end user
can choose the one he'd like to use).
So, if some "strong authentication" criteria are matched during browser
authentication process, after providing user and password, user will get a
form allowing him to choose the second factory system he'd like to use to
authenticate.
My goal is to be able to reuse existing authenticator. (So, not to write a
big 2fa authenticator with all authenticators duplicated inside).
Thanks in advance for your valuable input
Cheers
St
7 years
Using Keycloak with Microsoft Azure Active Directory
by Reed Lewis
I am attempting to use Microsoft Azure Active Directory with Keycloak.
It is not working correctly.
Here is how I have it configured:
OpenID Connect V1.0
Enabled: On
Store Tokens: On
Store Tokens Readable: On
Trust Email: On
Authorization URL: https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/authorize
Token URL: https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/token
Logout URL: <none>
Backchannel Logout: Off
User Info URL: <blank>
First Login Flow: First Broker Login
It directs me to the Microsoft page to login correctly, but when it comes back to keycloak, it either only has the first and last name, but no email address.
Is there something I have configured incorrectly?
I also tried to use the built in Microsoft connector, but that does not work with Azure Active Directory.
Thank you,
Reed Lewis
7 years
Fwd: Error when session expired and ajax request execute in Keycloak?
by Adam Daduev
After login, i get in my app, and for all my ajax request from page to
backing bean, i receive response 401 even if the session is still alive.
If removed autodetect-bearer-only option, all work fine, but going back to
the old error.
XMLHttpRequest cannot load http://dc09-apps-06:8090/auth/
realms/azovstal/protocol/openid-connect/auth?…ml&state=
60%2F01fc2e79-6fc0-46b8-9f83-39b7421fedf9&login=true&scope=openid. No
'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource.
Origin 'http://localhost:8080' is therefore not allowed access.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Adam Daduev <daduev.ad(a)gmail.com>
Date: вт, 10 янв. 2017 г. в 14:08
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Error when session expired and ajax request
execute in Keycloak?
To: <stian(a)redhat.com>
I tried, but does not work.
Firstly, i add autodetect-bearer-only option via adapter subsystem, wildfly
not started, he not know autodetect-bearer-only option, then, i added via
json, wildfly started and app was deployed.
Secondly, on my ajax request to backing bean, i receive response 401 and
does not happend.
This is my keycloak.json
{
"realm": "azovstal",
"auth-server-url": "http://dc09-apps-06:8090/auth",
"ssl-required": "none",
"resource": "web-test",
"public-client": true,
"use-resource-role-mappings": true,
"autodetect-bearer-only": true
}
вт, 10 янв. 2017 г. в 10:19, <daduev.ad(a)gmail.com>:
Ok, I try, thanks.
10 янв. 2017 г., в 07:07, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com> написал(а):
In that case take a look at the new autodetect-bearer-only option. You'll
need 2.5.0.Final for that.
On 9 January 2017 at 19:18, <daduev.ad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No, I have jsf 2 app with richfaces framework, which deploy on wildfly
10.1.
9 янв. 2017 г., в 14:51, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com> написал(а):
[Adding list back]
A web app redirects the user to a login page if not authenticated, while a
service should return a 401.
It sounds like what you have is a JS application with a service backend. In
Keycloak you should have two separate types of clients for that. The JS
application should be a public client, while the services a bearer-only
client.
On 9 January 2017 at 13:39, Adam Daduev <daduev.ad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for the answer.
Yes i have confidential client, i have web application, that asks
Keycloak server
to authenticate a user for them. As I understand, bearer-only is for web
services clients.
I probably something do not understand?
2017-01-09 11:44 GMT+02:00 Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>:
Looks like your services are configured as confidential clients rather than
bearer-only and hence is sending a login request back rather than a 401.
You should either swap your service war to be a bearer-only client or use
the new autodetect-bearer-only option in adapters if you have both web
pages and services in the same war.
On 8 January 2017 at 23:29, Adam Daduev <daduev.ad(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, can you help me!
When session expired and ajax request execute in Keycloak, i have error in
browser console:
XMLHttpRequest cannot load http://dc09-apps-06:8090/auth/
realms/azovstal/protocol/openid-connect/auth?…ml&state=
60%2F01fc2e79-6fc0-46b8-9f83-39b7421fedf9&login=true&scope=openid. No
'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource.
Origin 'http://localhost:8080' is therefore not allowed access.
I add in Keycloak admin console, in the client setting, Web Origins=
http://localhost:8080 (or *), and enabled cors in app, but still has error
in console. I used Keycloak 2.5.0
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
7 years, 2 months
Spring Boot adapter with HTTP verb based authorization
by Andreea Ciuprina
Hello!
We are building an online application for which we are using Keycloak for authentification and authorization, connected
to our Spring Boot backend using the Spring Boot adapter.
We would like to achive more fine-grained authorization, more specifically, we would like to set-up HTTP verb based
authorization, for example, allow only GET requests for some end-points, GET and POST for others, only POST for other end-points etc.
I am aware of the Policy Enforcer adapter, but I could not find any specific documentation regarding how to use that with Spring Boot, where there is
not keycloak.json file used for configuration.
Therefore, my questions are:
1. Can HTTP verb based authorization be achieved using the Spring Boot adapter?
2. If the answer to question 1 is yes, then could you please provide a minimal configuration example?
Thank you!
Best regards,
Andreea
---------------------------------------------------------
Andreea Ciuprina
Bioinformatics Group
Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology
Celsiusstraße 1
28359 Bremen
Germany
Phone: +49(0) 421 2028 982
Email: aciuprin@mpi-bremen.de
&
Jacobs University Bremen,
28759 Bremen, Germany
Email: a.ciuprina@jacobs-university.de
7 years, 3 months
Spring security adapter for SAML
by Pulkit Gupta
Hi Team,
I have a application with Spring security configured.
We are trying to migrate the same to keycloak.
Do we have a spring security adapter for keycloak with SAML.
I went through the documentation and can see that we have a spring adapter
but that is for open ID connect.
--
Thanks,
Pulkit
AMS
7 years, 3 months
Best way to verify an AccessToken with RSATokenVerifer and keycloak-admin-client
by Thomas Darimont
Hello Group,
what is currently the best way to verify an access token with the
keycloak-admin-client in an application without a configured keycloak
deployment/adapter?
In the adapter scenario the PublicKey needed by the RSATokenVerifier is
retrieved with a PublicKeyLocator which is provided by the
KeycloakDeployment.
With no deployment at hand one needs to retrieve the public key dynamically
to deal with key rotation. I found two variants to do this - which one do
you think is the best?
Variant 1)
Iterate over keycloak.realm(realmId).keys().getKeyMetadata().getKeys()
and find the public key currently referenced by the kid in the JWKSHeader
of the AccessToken.
However this requires that the current user / client role has at least one
role of the realm-management client, e.g. view-realm.
Variant 2)
Send a GET Request without any authentication to
http://192.168.99.1:8080/auth
This will return the representation of the PublicRealmResource as JSON
which contains the
currently active RSA public key for the realm.
This variant doesn't require any role on the client / user since it doesn't
require authentication.
Unfortunately the current keycloak-admin-client doesn't seem to provide a
way to access the PublicRealmResource information which requires additional
code to fetch the resource.
Is there a reason for this or is this "just" an API gap that can be fixed?
You can find a gist with a quick demo for the two variants here:
https://gist.github.com/thomasdarimont/52152ed68486c65b50a04fcf7bd9bbde
Cheers,
Thomas
7 years, 4 months
Support for transactional email providers like SendGrid, Mailgun or Mandrill
by Vineet Reynolds
Hi everybody,
Has anyone managed to configure Keycloak 2.0.0.Final to use a
transactional email API instead of configuring an SMTP server? I would
prefer to have Keycloak send emails using a rest API like Sendgrid,
Mandrill, Mailgun or Amazon SES (the cloud-native way) instead of running
an SMTP server.
I'd also appreciate if this is possible through the SPI providers.
* Should I implement both EmailSenderProvider and EmailTemplateProvider
SPIs ?
* I cannot get my custom EmailSenderProvider SPI implementation to work,
as the FreemarkerEmailTemplateProvider implementation fails to obtain the
implementation of the EmailSenderProvider. Stack trace is below
13:17:53,991 ERROR
[org.keycloak.forms.login.freemarker.FreeMarkerLoginFormsProvider] (default
task-39) Failed to send verification email:
org.keycloak.email.EmailException: Failed to template email
at
org.keycloak.email.freemarker.FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.send(FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.java:179)
at
org.keycloak.email.freemarker.FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.send(FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.java:150)
at
org.keycloak.email.freemarker.FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.sendVerifyEmail(FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.java:146)
at
org.keycloak.forms.login.freemarker.FreeMarkerLoginFormsProvider.createResponse(FreeMarkerLoginFormsProvider.java:156)
at
org.keycloak.authentication.requiredactions.VerifyEmail.requiredActionChallenge(VerifyEmail.java:73)
at
org.keycloak.services.managers.AuthenticationManager.executionActions(AuthenticationManager.java:559)
at
org.keycloak.services.managers.AuthenticationManager.actionRequired(AuthenticationManager.java:490)
at
org.keycloak.services.managers.AuthenticationManager.nextActionAfterAuthentication(AuthenticationManager.java:412)
at
org.keycloak.services.resources.LoginActionsService$Checks.verifyRequiredAction(LoginActionsService.java:299)
at
org.keycloak.services.resources.LoginActionsService.processRequireAction(LoginActionsService.java:853)
at
org.keycloak.services.resources.LoginActionsService.requiredActionGET(LoginActionsService.java:846)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.core.MethodInjectorImpl.invoke(MethodInjectorImpl.java:139)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceMethodInvoker.invokeOnTarget(ResourceMethodInvoker.java:295)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceMethodInvoker.invoke(ResourceMethodInvoker.java:249)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceLocatorInvoker.invokeOnTargetObject(ResourceLocatorInvoker.java:138)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.core.ResourceLocatorInvoker.invoke(ResourceLocatorInvoker.java:101)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.invoke(SynchronousDispatcher.java:395)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.core.SynchronousDispatcher.invoke(SynchronousDispatcher.java:202)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.ServletContainerDispatcher.service(ServletContainerDispatcher.java:221)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.HttpServletDispatcher.service(HttpServletDispatcher.java:56)
at
org.jboss.resteasy.plugins.server.servlet.HttpServletDispatcher.service(HttpServletDispatcher.java:51)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:790)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletHandler.handleRequest(ServletHandler.java:85)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterHandler.java:129)
at
org.keycloak.services.filters.KeycloakSessionServletFilter.doFilter(KeycloakSessionServletFilter.java:90)
at io.undertow.servlet.core.ManagedFilter.doFilter(ManagedFilter.java:60)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler$FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterHandler.java:131)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.FilterHandler.handleRequest(FilterHandler.java:84)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletSecurityRoleHandler.handleRequest(ServletSecurityRoleHandler.java:62)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletDispatchingHandler.handleRequest(ServletDispatchingHandler.java:36)
at
org.wildfly.extension.undertow.security.SecurityContextAssociationHandler.handleRequest(SecurityContextAssociationHandler.java:78)
at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.SSLInformationAssociationHandler.handleRequest(SSLInformationAssociationHandler.java:131)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.handleRequest(ServletAuthenticationCallHandler.java:57)
at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
at
io.undertow.security.handlers.AbstractConfidentialityHandler.handleRequest(AbstractConfidentialityHandler.java:46)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.handleRequest(ServletConfidentialityConstraintHandler.java:64)
at
io.undertow.security.handlers.AuthenticationMechanismsHandler.handleRequest(AuthenticationMechanismsHandler.java:60)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.security.CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.handleRequest(CachedAuthenticatedSessionHandler.java:77)
at
io.undertow.security.handlers.NotificationReceiverHandler.handleRequest(NotificationReceiverHandler.java:50)
at
io.undertow.security.handlers.AbstractSecurityContextAssociationHandler.handleRequest(AbstractSecurityContextAssociationHandler.java:43)
at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
at
org.wildfly.extension.undertow.security.jacc.JACCContextIdHandler.handleRequest(JACCContextIdHandler.java:61)
at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
at
io.undertow.server.handlers.PredicateHandler.handleRequest(PredicateHandler.java:43)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.handleFirstRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:284)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.dispatchRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:263)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler.access$000(ServletInitialHandler.java:81)
at
io.undertow.servlet.handlers.ServletInitialHandler$1.handleRequest(ServletInitialHandler.java:174)
at io.undertow.server.Connectors.executeRootHandler(Connectors.java:202)
at io.undertow.server.HttpServerExchange$1.run(HttpServerExchange.java:793)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.keycloak.email.freemarker.FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.send(FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.java:185)
at
org.keycloak.email.freemarker.FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.send(FreeMarkerEmailTemplateProvider.java:177)
... 57 more
Thanks,
Vineet
7 years, 4 months
Group Level Roles Not Honored by Policy Evaluation Tool
by Jeremy Majors
I have setup my users to have the 'read' role by associating that role to a group which my users have been associated with. While testing the policies for a resource using the Policy Evaluation tool I determined that the roles associated with the groups weren't being picked up and the user was being denied access to the resource (please note that when I looked at the user's roles I did notice that 'read' was listed as an effective role). When I removed one of the users from the group and directly assigned the 'role' to the user then I was able to successfully access the resource using the Policy Evaluation tool.
Can anyone else reproduce this issue? It's unclear whether it could be related to KEYCLOAK-2964, which has been closed.
Thanks in advance,
Jeremy
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
7 years, 4 months
