Hi,
thanks, we went with docker swarm, where we have other services already. So I want to try
to get the unicast working.
I´ll take a look at JDBC_PING though.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Schuster Sebastian (INST/ESY1) [mailto:Sebastian.Schuster@bosch-si.com]
Gesendet: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 4:31 PM
An: Marc Tempelmeier <marc.tempelmeier(a)flane.de>; keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Betreff: RE: Unicast
Hi Marc,
I don't have production experience with it yet, but you can setup JGroups discovery to
use the DB (JDBC_PING) instead of multicast.
You can see how this works on Kubernetes and MySQL for example at
https://github.com/Reposoft/keycloak-ha-kubernetes/tree/keycloak3-ha-mysq....
Using Minikube (
https://github.com/kubernetes/minikube) you will have a Keycloak cluster
running in no time (if you don’t try to mount persistent volumes for the DB from the host
as I did :)
Best regards,
Sebastian
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Sebastian Schuster
Engineering and Support (INST/ESY1)
Bosch Software Innovations GmbH | Schöneberger Ufer 89-91 | 10785 Berlin | GERMANY |
www.bosch-si.com Tel. +49 30 726112-485 | Fax +49 30 726112-100 |
Sebastian.Schuster(a)bosch-si.com
Sitz: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B
Geschäftsführung: Dr.-Ing. Rainer Kallenbach, Michael Hahn
-----Original Message-----
From: keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:keycloak-user-
bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Marc Tempelmeier
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Juni 2017 15:36
To: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: [keycloak-user] Unicast
Hi,
does someone here use unicast instead of multicast to form a cluster?
If yes, I would be interested in the config :)
Best regards
Marc
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user