Re: [keycloak-user] Replace use of Infinispan with User Sessions SPI ?

Hi Marek, > Am 14.12.2015 um 08:50 schrieb Marek Posolda <mposolda(a)redhat.com > <mailto:mposolda@redhat.com>>: > > Btv. what's your motivation to not use infinispan? If you afraid of > cluster communication, you don't need to worry much about it, because > if you run single keycloak through standalone.xml, the infinispan > automatically works in LOCAL mode and there is no any cluster > communication at all. My current customer is running his apps in AWS. As known, multicast is not available in cloud infrastructures. Wildfly/Infinispan Cluster works pretty well with multicast w/o having to know too much about JGroups config. S3_PING seams to be a viable way to get a cluster running in AWS. But additionally, my customer doesn’t have any (deep) knowledge about JBoss infrastructures and so I’m looking for a way to be able to run Keycloak in a cluster in AWS without the need to build up deeper knowlegde of JGroups config, for example in getting rid of Infinispan. But I do understand all the concerns in doing this. I still have to test S3_PING, if it works as easy as multicast. If yes, we can use it, if no… I don’t know yet. But this gets offtopic for Keycloak mailinglist, it’s more related to pure Wildfly/Infinispan.