Hi everyone,
I'm implementing an authentication SPI execution on top of the "normal"
username/password form of kc 3.4.3.Final. ->
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/services/src/main/java/o...
Sadly, usernames are not unique atm, so I need to change the execution,
so that it doesn't stop with "invalid credentials" for a user who was
found in one Provider.
Instead of giving the "invalid credentials"-error, I want my execution
to first check all other providers for the same username, and then check
the credentials against all matches. And just in case of no credentials
matching, it should fail, or login a new session for this user when one
is found in any of my (3) Providers, which are added by user federation
feature (2 ADs, one by a custom user storage SPI).
So I drilled it down to the method validatePassword(...) in
AbstractUsernameFormAuthenticator.java ->
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/services/src/main/java/o...
line 191, which I want to change accordingly. Sadly, I can't find a
method to get all Providers of the realm and check accordingly. The code
I want to change is:
if (password != null && !password.isEmpty() &&
context.getSession().userCredentialManager().isValid(context.getRealm(),
user, credentials)) {
return true;
} else {...}
instead of just checking isValid() for one provider, which is what this
does atm, I want to check all Providers. Like this pseudocode:
if (password != null && !password.isEmpty() &&
context.getSession().userCredentialManager().isValid(context.getRealm(),
user, credentials)) {
boolean isValid = false;
List<Provider> realmProviders = context.getAllProviders();
for(Provider provider : realmProviders){
isValid = provider.isValid(...);
}
return isValid;
} else {...}
Could anyone perhaps give me a hint in how to achieve this? I haven't
found a method yet to get all Providers and check for isValid in any of
the given ones.
Best regards,
Dominik
p.s. I created a stackoverflow question here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48399622/keycloak-check-password-in-m...
feel free to comment/answer there :)