Re: [keycloak-user] Supporting sticky sessions

Users are cached so that helps + it's possible to load balance based on source address. Do you really think that a lot of people will run that many nodes in either case? On 4 March 2016 at 14:52, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > I"m not sure how well keycloak would scale without this. > > > On 3/4/2016 7:15 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote: > > Eventually it would be nice to support the ability for load balancers to > send all requests for a particular user session to the same node (browser > as well as client requests). > > More details here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2352 > > Is this a high priority for 1.9 or should it be 2.x? We may be able to > put it into 1.9.2 if required. > > I'd like feedback on how useful folks think it would be as well as > feedback on the proposed implementation. > > > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-user mailing listkeycloak-user@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user > > > -- > Bill Burke > JBoss, a division of Red Hathttp://bill.burkecentral.com > > > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-user mailing list > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user > _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user