This is not a bug, its a feature request. The IDP-SSO-Initiated link is
not set up to process SAML requests. I didn't even think that people
would want to do a broker initiated sso.
On 11/14/16 9:23 AM, Josh Cain wrote:
@Chris - yep, exactly the same thing. Thanks for pointing me to the
right bug, I'll continue discussion there!
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 09:36 +0000, Chris Brandhorst wrote:
> Let’s forget about FOOBAR. From my JIRA ticket, I’m trying an IdP-
> initiated SSO from IdP A to
> IdP B (after which we can do all sorts of things with the
> authenticators).
>
> Stian called this a bug (set for 2.4.1.Final now), but it seems
> you’re saying this is not supported?
> This causes me some confusion, can you clarify?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>> On 13 Nov 2016, at 15:49, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> So, you have Application FOOBAR which is secured by IDP 'B'. You
>> want
>> to register an IDP initiated SSO link on IDP 'A' that redirects to
>> IDP
>> 'B' that redirects to Application FOOBAR? That's not something we
>> support at the moment.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/13/16 9:16 AM, Chris Brandhorst wrote:
>>> Isn’t this like my question:
>>>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/2016-October/00793
>>> 5.html
>>>
>>> and bug report:
>>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-3731
>>>
>>> If you're trying to do IDP-initiated SSO starting from the
>>> external IDP,
>>> that's not something we support.
>>> It seems that that’s exactly what we are attempting. Why
>>> shouldn’t that be
>>> supported and what does that mean for my bug report (which was
>>> already
>>> worked on)?
>>>
>>> On 13 Nov 2016, at 15:06, Bill Burke <bburke@redhat.com<mailto:bb
>>> urke(a)redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So, you:
>>>
>>> 1. visit the IDP-initiated SSO URL on keycloak
>>>
>>> 2. Select an external IDP to login from on the Keycloak login
>>> page
>>>
>>> 3. Login to the external IDP
>>>
>>> 4. Failure?
>>>
>>> Sounds like a bug.
>>>
>>> If you're trying to do IDP-initiated SSO starting from the
>>> external IDP,
>>> that's not something we support.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/11/16 11:13 PM, Josh Cain wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm attempting an IDP-initiated SSO (via unsolicited SAML
>>> Request)
>>> against the Keycloak broker service. However, it's failing every
>>> time
>>> on the IdentityBrokerService.authenticated(..) method. I get the
>>> following error on the console:
>>>
>>> 22:05:04,945 ERROR [org.keycloak.services] (default task-61)
>>> staleCodeMessage
>>>
>>> This method seems to think that clients should *always* visit the
>>> Keycloak IDP before returning with a SAML assertion, a the
>>> failure to
>>> retrieve an associated client session is causing a serious
>>> issue. I am
>>> able to successfully use the identity brokering functions if I
>>> use an
>>> SP-initiated flow, so I know the brokering piece is configured
>>> correctly.
>>>
>>> Is this a limitation in the current implementation, or do I have
>>> something configured incorrectly?
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-user mailing list
>>> keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org<mailto:keycloak-user@lists.jboss.or
>>> g>
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> keycloak-user mailing list
>>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-user mailing list
>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user