On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:04 PM Marek Lindner <mareklindner(a)neomailbox.ch>
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 June 2019 22:05:00 HKT Pedro Igor Silva wrote:
> The name attribute is unique for a client+owner basis.
>
> The unicity of ids is important as we have optimizations around it.
I fully understand why an ID has to be unique. My question was about the
name
being unique per client+owner. What makes the name attribute special to
require it to be unique per client+owner ?
You may have resources with the same name belonging to different owners. I
also forgot to mention that we also have lookups by name on a per owner
basis.
> In the future, we are planning to make two main enhancements to resource
> mgmt:
>
> * Resource-less Evaluation, so that you don't actually need to manage
> resources in Keycloak in order to evaluate policies. This can be done
today
> using a single resource and a JS policy though, but we can provide
> something better.
> * Resource SPI, so that you can plug your resource store instead of using
> Keycloak internal database
Great plan!
Cheers,
Marek
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user