Re: [keycloak-user] Problem using SAML IdP

Can you spell out exactly what you need here as I'm not understanding. You need to support a complex attribute type? Is that it? On 1/22/2016 4:27 AM, Jérôme Blanchard wrote: Hi Bill, all, I succeed in authenticating via shibboleth federation using SAML IdP but I encounter problem. One SAML attribute of our authentication response is not of type String but a fulle NameID type (eduPersonTargetId) and makes the authentication crash because of class BaseWriter which is not able to serialize an attribute which is not a String (line 176). If I avoid this test, authentication works well using the UsernameTemplateMapper. By the way, it does not solve the whole problem. The provider user id and the provider user name store the saml auth response nameid (and not an attribute) which makes the next IdP SAML session impossible to use the same keycloak account because of a change of this transient nameid... Actually, I don't see another solution than rewriting another Identity Provider based on Shibboleth attribute as a fork of the SAML provider but including. It will also allows me to include the Shibboleth DIscovery Service directly in keycloak instead of providing another webapp to ensure the federation idps synchronization by parsing periodiccaly the WAYF file. I will also provide a small patch for the BaseWriter in order to allow serialization of complex types attribute, except if you have in mind to do so... Best regards, Jérôme. Le jeu. 14 janv. 2016 à 15:37, Jérôme Blanchard <jayblanc(a)gmail.com&gt; a écrit : > Thanks for your answer. > In fact Shibboleth supports others saml nameid but in the renater > federation, it only contains transient nameid. Here is a part of their doc > (sorry it's in french) : > Utilisation des identifiants utilisateur opaques > > Voir la description du eduPersonTargetedID > <https://services.renater.fr/federation/faq/shibboleth#definition_d_un_ide... > > Votre application a peut-être besoin de manipuler de identifiants > utilisateur, dont la valeur est stable d'une session à l'autre ; par > exemple pour gérer les préférences utilisateur. Or, pour des raisons de > protection des données personnelles, les fournisseurs d'identités ne > peuvent vous transmettre les identifiants des utilisateurs. Dans ce cas, > vous pouvez demander aux fournisseurs d'identités de vous communiquer des > identifiants stables mais opaques, appelés *eduPersonTargetedID*. > > Vous devrez configurer le fichier *AAP.xml* de votre fournisseur de > services Shibboleth comme indiqué ci-dessous : > > <AttributeRule Name="urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.5923.1.1.1.10" Header="Shib-TargetedID" Alias="targeted_id"> > <AnySite> > <AnyValue/> > </AnySite> > </AttributeRule> > > L'attribut sera accessible pour l'application dans l'en-tête HTTP > *HTTP_SHIB_TARGETEDID* (avec Shibboleth 1.3). Le format du > eduPersonTargetedID est le suivant : identifiant_IdP*!*identifiant_SP*!*identifiant_utilisateur > > > > According to their doc, nameid are session based and not user based so if > you want stable identifier, you have to ask for eduPersonTargetedID > attribute !! > I'm going to have a look at UsernameTemplateMapper. > Thanks again, Jérôme. > > Le jeu. 14 janv. 2016 à 15:23, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; a écrit : > >> Shibboleth only supports transient name ids? I find that hard to >> believe. Remember Keycloak would just look like any other client. IMO you >> should go that route. >> >> Also though, I think you might be able to write a Broker Mapper, take a >> look at UsernameTemplateMapper. This SPI is undocumented and unsupported >> at the moment, but I hope to change that soon. >> >> >> On 1/14/2016 6:20 AM, Jérôme Blanchard wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> According to shibboleth specification, IdP of a federation usually use >> transient NameID which makes Shibboleth impossible to interface with >> keycloak, even if we manage the Discovery Service externally in order to >> maintain IdP list mapping between federation and keycloak. >> It's really annoying for me and I'm trying to investigate a way to solve >> this problem. >> In my federation, some doc say that if you need to manage personnal user >> information in your application, you have to rely on a dedicated attribute >> in order to retreive real user id and not the transient opaque one. In this >> case, an attribute called eduPersoneTargetedId exists and can be use by >> shibboleth. >> I am trying to patch the saml broker in order to take into consideration >> this attribute in a kind of attributeToNameIdMapper but I have to admit >> that I'm lost a bit in the code. >> Do you think this approach is good ? >> >> Best regards, Jérôme. >> >> >> Le mer. 6 janv. 2016 à 09:31, Jérôme Blanchard <jayblanc(a)gmail.com&gt; a >> écrit : >> >>> Hi Bill, all, >>> >>> In the case of a transient only nameid, would it be possible to create >>> a dedicated attribute mapper in order to use for exemple the email >>> attribute as name identifier ? >>> >>> PS : the urn:mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier is in fact use in SAML >>> v1 for request a nameid that is transient also... so there is no solution >>> in this way. >>> >>> Best regards, Jérôme. >>> >>> Le mar. 5 janv. 2016 à 16:13, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com&gt; a écrit : >>> >>>> We won't be able to support temporary ids (transient) for awhile as it >>>> requires temporary user creation which requires some rearchitecting. >>>> >>>> As for "urn:mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier" if you spec it out in a >>>> JIRA and it is simple enough to implement support for, we may be able >>>> to >>>> get it in. >>>> >>>> On 1/5/2016 8:18 AM, Jérôme Blanchard wrote: >>>> > Hi Bill, >>>> > >>>> > Thanks for your answer regarding transient and temporary ids. I >>>> > understand the problem due to keycloak account creation and binding >>>> to >>>> > the IdP. >>>> > Renarter is using Shibboleth ; Is there is any work on shibboleth >>>> > integration for keycloak ? >>>> > If I look into the idps entities descriptors of renater, I found >>>> that it >>>> > uses also another nameid format based on shibboleth namesapce : >>>> > >>>> <md:NameIDFormat>urn:mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier</md:NameIDFormat> >>>> > >>>> <md:NameIDFormat>urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:transient</md:NameIDFormat> >>>> > >>>> > Do you think it is possible to patch the saml idp provider (or to >>>> create >>>> > another one dedicated to shibboleth) in order to integrate keycloak >>>> to >>>> > our identity federation (renater) ? >>>> > >>>> > Best whiches for this upcoming year and thanks for your great work >>>> > around keycloak. >>>> > >>>> > Jérôme. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Le mar. 22 déc. 2015 à 21:10, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com >>>> > <mailto:bburke@redhat.com>> a écrit : >>>> > >>>> > Our brokering doesn't support temporary user ids from the >>>> "parent" IDP. >>>> > Transient Ids in SAML or temporary ids. >>>> > >>>> > On 12/22/2015 11:46 AM, Jérôme Blanchard wrote: >>>> > > Hi, >>>> > > >>>> > > I'm trying to integrate keycloak into a the french research >>>> > federation >>>> > > of identity (renater) and I'm facing some problems. >>>> > > Actually, when IdP respond to keycloak i'm getting the >>>> following >>>> > error : >>>> > > PL00084: Writer: Unsupported Attribute >>>> > > Value:org.keycloak.dom.saml.v2.assertion.NameIDType >>>> > > >>>> > > It seems that this IdP is using transient NameID policy only >>>> and >>>> > using >>>> > > the unspecified field in the idp config in keycloak generate >>>> this >>>> > > exception as a return. >>>> > > >>>> > > Log of the keycloak server is joined. >>>> > > >>>> > > I have no idea of what happening because when I was using the >>>> test >>>> > > federation, everything was working but no I'm in the >>>> production >>>> > > federation, login fails. >>>> > > >>>> > > The renater federation is using Shibolleth and keycloak is not >>>> > supported >>>> > > by federation moderators so I'm alone in the dark now... >>>> > > >>>> > > Renater provides an IdP list that I have to parse and >>>> > synchronized with >>>> > > IdP in keycloak. As a return I provide a list of all endpoints >>>> > for each >>>> > > keycloak registered IdP to allow federation IdP to answear >>>> > correctly to >>>> > > the right endpoint. All of this is done by a small web app >>>> deployed >>>> > > aside keycloak and using REST API to synchronize all the IdP. >>>> > > >>>> > > One of the IdP entity descriptor is joined. As you can see, >>>> only >>>> > > transient nameid policy is supported and if I configure >>>> keycloak >>>> > to use >>>> > > email or persistent, I received a response saying that the >>>> nameid >>>> > is not >>>> > > supported : >>>> > > >>>> > > <samlp:AuthnRequest >>>> > xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol" >>>> > > xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion" >>>> > > >>>> > AssertionConsumerServiceURL=" >>>> <https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang/broker/2db5eab3f83cbaa... >>>> https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang/broker/2db5eab3f83cbaa... >>>> " >>>> > > Destination=" >>>> <https://janus.cnrs.fr/idp/profile/SAML2/POST/SSO> >>>> https://janus.cnrs.fr/idp/profile/SAML2/POST/SSO" >>>> > > ForceAuthn="false" >>>> ID="ID_c53b5759-cb97-4e95-b540-877a7a6c625d" >>>> > > IsPassive="false" IssueInstant="2015-12-22T16:13:15.987Z" >>>> > > >>>> ProtocolBinding="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:bindings:HTTP-POST" >>>> > > Version="2.0"><saml:Issuer >>>> > > >>>> > xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"> >>>> <https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang> >>>> https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang >>>> </saml:Issuer><samlp:NameIDPolicy >>>> > > AllowCreate="true" >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:emailAddress"/></samlp:AuthnRequest> >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > <saml2p:Response >>>> xmlns:saml2p="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol" >>>> > > >>>> > Destination=" >>>> <https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang/broker/2db5eab3f83cbaa... >>>> https://demo-auth.ortolang.fr/auth/realms/ortolang/broker/2db5eab3f83cbaa... >>>> " >>>> > > ID="_9d03761957aade819b6823c35bbab278" >>>> > > InResponseTo="ID_c53b5759-cb97-4e95-b540-877a7a6c625d" >>>> > > IssueInstant="2015-12-22T16:13:16.420Z" >>>> Version="2.0"><saml2:Issuer >>>> > > xmlns:saml2="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion" >>>> > > >>>> > Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity"> >>>> <https://janus.cnrs.fr/idp>https://janus.cnrs.fr/idp >>>> </saml2:Issuer><saml2p:Status><saml2p:StatusCode >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Responder"><saml2p:StatusCode >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:InvalidNameIDPolicy"/></saml2p:StatusCode><saml2p:StatusMessage>Required >>>> > > NameID format not >>>> > > >>>> supported</saml2p:StatusMessage></saml2p:Status></saml2p:Response> >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > Any help would be gracefully appreciated. >>>> > > >>>> > > Thanks a lot, Jérôme. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > keycloak-user mailing list >>>> > > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: >>>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Bill Burke >>>> > JBoss, a division of Red Hat >>>> > http://bill.burkecentral.com >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > keycloak-user mailing list >>>> > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto: >>>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bill Burke >>>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat >>>> http://bill.burkecentral.com >>>> >>> >> -- >> Bill Burke >> JBoss, a division of Red Hathttp://bill.burkecentral.com >> >> -- Bill Burke JBoss, a division of Red Hathttp://bill.burkecentral.com