Hello!
I am currently implementing this feature described below. The feature is not really
relevant for this question but I thought I could include it.
I was wondering, before I make a PR, should I include integration tests even for the UI
(the console module, which from what I can tell is not run with Travis)? And is there a
way of testing a single arquillian integration test in an IDE (for the console module)?
I don't know if this is the right forum to ask these questions but I thought I'll
give it a try
Thanks in advance
Fabian Eriksson
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruno Oliveira [mailto:bruno@abstractj.org]
Sent: den 11 januari 2017 19:18
To: Eriksson Fabian
Cc: stian(a)redhat.com; keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Brute force detector extension
I believe the best is to create Jira as a feature request. And later you can attach your
PR to that.
On 2017-01-11, Eriksson Fabian wrote:
Do you want me to create a new feature request through the dev
mailing list or could I immediately create a Jira-ticket?
Best regards
Fabian Eriksson
From: Stian Thorgersen [mailto:sthorger@redhat.com]
Sent: den 2 januari 2017 09:15
To: Eriksson Fabian
Cc: keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Brute force detector extension
You can implement a custom provider for the brute force protection that would do what you
want. It wouldn't be configurable through the admin console though.
I don't see why we couldn't add it as an option to the built-in provider though
so if you are happy to send a PR for it including tests we could accept it into 3.x.
On 21 December 2016 at 11:24, Eriksson Fabian
<fabian.eriksson@gi-de.com<mailto:fabian.eriksson@gi-de.com>> wrote:
Hi all!
We would like to have ability to configure the brute force detector so it can disable a
user account after X failed attempts completely and not only lock him/her out for a period
of time (setting the lockout-time to a few years is not enough). In the end we would like
the admins of KeyCloak to be able to set a timed lockout-period or set a permanent one for
different realms. I guess this would also require the detector to reset the
failed-login-attempts count on a successful login.
Does this sound interesting and could this then be something that we could contribute
with to KeyCloak?
Or is there a way to substitute the already existing brute force detector?
Thanks in advance!
Fabian Eriksson
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org<mailto:keycloak-user@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
--
abstractj