Stian,
No, I don't believe its in that PR. This seems to be the table
"CHILD_ROLE" which has a large number of queries being executed against
it. But I'm not sure which entity that maps to in your persistence.xml
John
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:54 AM Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Sure, please create a JIRA and link it to
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-4593
Does this PR help:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/3561?
On 23 May 2017 at 15:04, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Stian,
>
> We just got a report of a new issue, not sure if its related to the
> existing but I can create a ticket on your side if it makes sense.
>
> When accessing /auth/realms/master/protocol/openid-connect/token we are
> seeing 3k SQLs being executed of this format:
>
> select compositer0_.COMPOSITE as COMPOSIT1_16_0_, compositer0_.CHILD_ROLE
> as CHILD_RO2_16_0_, roleentity1_.ID as ID1_38_1_, roleentity1_.CLIENT as
> CLIENT8_38_1_, roleentity1_.CLIENT_REALM_CONSTRAINT as CLIENT_R2_38_1_,
> roleentity1_.CLIENT_ROLE as CLIENT_R3_38_1_, roleentity1_.DESCRIPTION as
> DESCRIPT4_38_1_, roleentity1_.NAME as NAME5_38_1_, roleentity1_.REALM as
> REALM9_38_1_, roleentity1_.REALM_ID as REALM_ID6_38_1_,
> roleentity1_.SCOPE_PARAM_REQUIRED as SCOPE_PA7_38_1_ from COMPOSITE_ROLE
> compositer0_ inner join KEYCLOAK_ROLE roleentity1_ on
> compositer0_.CHILD_ROLE=roleentity1_.ID where compositer0_.COMPOSITE=?
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:40 PM John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Stian,
>>
>> Good news. Glad to see these things get prioritized. So far they look
>> like they're matching the problems I'm running into, specifically around
>> the whoami endpoint and overall number of SQLs (2800 queries in one of my
>> tests) and the total number of DB connections allocated within that one
>> request (3200+).
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:02 AM Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There are a number of issues around having a large number of realms. We
>>> have a general issue open to support this:
>>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-4593
>>>
>>> We haven't prioritized this in the past, but that has changed and we
>>> would like to get this sorted out.
>>>
>>> There's a few more related PRs including the one you linked:
>>>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/3557
>>>
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/3561
>>>
>>> On 10 May 2017 at 12:35, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> After enabling Keycloak and starting work on a multi-tenant
>>>> application, it
>>>> was noted that the admin console started to get very slow in keycloak.
>>>> After some searching around, it seemed like this was an already
>>>> reported
>>>> issue [1] and a fix underway [2]. I was wondering if this fix would
>>>> make
>>>> it into 3.2?
>>>>
>>>> If additional testing is needed, I'd be happy to help out. Deleting
>>>> 161
>>>> realms with minimal clients and users took me 15 minutes via the REST
>>>> API.
>>>>
>>>> [1]:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-4858
>>>> [2]:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/4095
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> keycloak-user mailing list
>>>> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>>>>
>>>
>>>