Users are cached so that helps + it's possible to load balance based on
source address. Do you really think that a lot of people will run that many
nodes in either case?
On 4 March 2016 at 14:52, Bill Burke <bburke(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I"m not sure how well keycloak would scale without this.
On 3/4/2016 7:15 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
Eventually it would be nice to support the ability for load balancers to
send all requests for a particular user session to the same node (browser
as well as client requests).
More details here:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-2352
Is this a high priority for 1.9 or should it be 2.x? We may be able to put
it into 1.9.2 if required.
I'd like feedback on how useful folks think it would be as well as
feedback on the proposed implementation.
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing
listkeycloak-user@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red
Hathttp://bill.burkecentral.com
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user