4:24 p.m.
Hi,
Using the userStorageManager, I don't think I could possibly get a
collection of UserModels where all users are just those where the
EMAIL_VERIFIED bit is set to 0, right?
If I'm wrong please let me know.
My use case is I'm creating a task to delete those users after a time as
long as the realm is configured to verify the email. I managed to get the
rest of the details right I think thanks to Marek Posolda, but I cannot
find a way to search specifically those users, because gathering all users
in memory and then iterating all the collection wouldn't be optimal. I'd
rather let that job to be done by the persistence layer.
Thanks.
6:36 a.m.
I think you're not wrong. ATM it's probably best to handle this at DB
level. After you run the task, which directly updates DB, it might be
needed to clear the userCache on Keycloak side, so the users, which were
cached and deleted by your task will be deleted from the cache too. It's
doable from admin console, but there is also REST endpoint to do this.
Marek
On 18/01/18 16:24, Tomás García wrote:
Hi,
Using the userStorageManager, I don't think I could possibly get a
collection of UserModels where all users are just those where the
EMAIL_VERIFIED bit is set to 0, right?
If I'm wrong please let me know.
My use case is I'm creating a task to delete those users after a time as
long as the realm is configured to verify the email. I managed to get the
rest of the details right I think thanks to Marek Posolda, but I cannot
find a way to search specifically those users, because gathering all users
in memory and then iterating all the collection wouldn't be optimal. I'd
rather let that job to be done by the persistence layer.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
2566
days inactive
2567
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Marek Posolda -
Tomás García