October 2011 - arquillian-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ARQ-232) Redesign Servlet protocol to be more human friendly

by Aslak Knutsen (JIRA)

Redesign Servlet protocol to be more human friendly --------------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-232 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-232 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Test Protocol SPIs and Implementation Reporter: Aslak Knutsen Priority: Minor We should redesign the Servlet communication protocol to be more Rest api like. This will make it easier for humans to execute tests outside of the Arquillian Client and opens for other clients to communicate with the test. http://arquillian.pastebin.com/XHsfaycJ Add support for html output -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ARQ-442) Change Examples modules to a container sanity test suite

by Aslak Knutsen (JIRA)

Change Examples modules to a container sanity test suite -------------------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-442 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-442 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 1.0.0.Beta1 Reporter: Aslak Knutsen The current examples modules should be recreated as a sanity test suite for the containers. Currently all containers have their own simple tests for validating the functionality. These container tests should be merged with the examples and created as a test suite. The test suite needs to be split up by package / module based on EE v / technology to support all containers(easy maven filtering). The containers should depend on this test suite and not the other way around. todo: research how to include a external module as a test suite for a module. (copy-dependencies / extract ? / container config etc) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

1
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ARQ-540) Support @ArquillianResource URL for in-container test cases

by Ian Brandt (JIRA)

Support @ArquillianResource URL for in-container test cases ----------------------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-540 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-540 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Enhancement Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 1.0.0.CR2 Reporter: Ian Brandt >From [IRC|http://echelog.matzon.dk/logs/browse/jbosstesting/1312408800]: {quote} [2:13pm] ianbrandt: aslak, Should @ArquillianResource injection work for in-container test cases? It works fine when I try it for an as-client test, but when I do the same in-container the org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.enricher.resource.URLResourceProvider.protocolMetadata.get() is null, so no context URL. I verified the container is returning a non-null ProtocolMetaData from deploy(...). [2:15pm] aslak: ianbrandt, no it currently doesn't work [2:16pm] aslak: ianbrandt, it probably should, but i'm not sure we have the info incontianer without doing a callback to the client.. [2:16pm] aslak: ianbrandt, but then we don't know which deployment we are when incontianer, so we have a little problem there.. [2:17pm] ianbrandt: aslak, Ah, okay. [2:17pm] aslak: no wait we do [2:18pm] aslak: the Protocol is executed within a DeploymentScope/ContainerScope, so when it gets the callback, it has the correct context.. [2:18pm] aslak: we tho need OperatesOnDeployment support for that tho, cuz you possible want to inject URLs not to your self, but to another deployment on possible another contianer that you should invoke from incontainer [2:19pm] aslak: so from incontianer on dep 1, we can do @ArqRes @OperatesOnDep("dep2") URL url; [2:23pm] ianbrandt: aslak, Makes sense. It's a little more than I could take on at the moment. I was just augmenting the Tomcat tests to show @ArqRes usage. I'll skip it for shouldBeAbleToInvokeServletInDeployedWebApp, and JIRA+Wiki the limitation. {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

2
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-634) Servlet 2.5 support on Servlet 3.0 containers

by Aslak Knutsen (Created) (JIRA)

Servlet 2.5 support on Servlet 3.0 containers --------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-634 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-634 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Enhancement Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Test Protocol SPIs and Implementation Affects Versions: 1.0.0.CR5 Reporter: Aslak Knutsen In a Servlet Container that is defined to use the Servlet 3.0 protocol, but the user defined deployment use a web.xml set to 2.5, the Arquillian Servlet which is added as a web-fragment.xml in the Servlet 3.0 impl will be ignored and Arquillian can not find itself. The Servlet Protocol could possible check the web.xml defined in @Deployment to determine which Servlet Protocol version to use. Meaning the Servlet 3.0 impl can downgrade to Servlet 2.5 in the packaging process. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

3
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ARQ-141) Add option to export the generated Archive to inspect the final deployment

by Aslak Knutsen (JIRA)

Add option to export the generated Archive to inspect the final deployment -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-141 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-141 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Task Components: Configuration, Documentation Reporter: Aslak Knutsen It is useful for debugging to have Arquillian export the Archive it is about to deploy, specially in IN_CONTAINER mode. Create a ArchiveExporter EventHandler on class level and make the export folder configurable. If option is not set: don't export -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

4
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ARQ-350) Map client events 1 to 1 with container events

by Aslak Knutsen (JIRA)

Map client events 1 to 1 with container events ---------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-350 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-350 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Feature Request Components: Base Implementation, Test Protocol SPIs and Implementation Reporter: Aslak Knutsen We should redo how the test execution lifecycles happen. In the current impl the flow is: Client(BeforSuite, BeforeClass, Before) -> Container(BeforSuite, BeforeClass, Before, Test, After, AfterClass, AfterSuite) -> Client(After, AfterClass, AfterSuite) We should map these 1 to 1 with the incontainer execution and keep the test instance alive between the calls. Client(BeforeClass) -> Container(BeforeClass) Client(Before) -> Container(Before) .. This way the execution is closer to how it normally would be, and extensions can interact with the Container/Environment or Client in the appropriate lifecycles more naturally. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

2
1
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ARQ-506) Support more complex property types in container configuration

by Gerhard Poul (JIRA)

Support more complex property types in container configuration -------------------------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-506 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-506 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Enhancement Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: Configuration Reporter: Gerhard Poul Priority: Optional It might sometimes be helpful to support arbitrary property lists within an arquillian configuration, such as when we want to make it possible to pass properties to the underlying container implementations, but that have no effect on the behavior of the arquillian-container-implementation itself. This is not to replace, but to augment the current configuration capability, such that we can provide something like the following in an arquillian.xml: <container qualifier="someQualifier" default="true"> <configuration> <propertyList name="somePropertyName"> <propertyEntry name="somePropertyEntryName" type="java.lang.String" value="someValue" /> <propertyEntry name="somePropertyEntryName2" type="java.lang.Integer" value="1234" /> ... </propertyList> <property name="someOtherProperty">someValue</property> </configuration> </container> -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

3
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ARQ-567) Supporting Test Suites (@ArquillianSuite)

by Mousavi Jahan Abadi S. M. (JIRA)

Supporting Test Suites (@ArquillianSuite) ----------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-567 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-567 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Mousavi Jahan Abadi S. M. Currently, it is supported that JUnit test cases being run by Arquillian. This feature request is request for supporting test suites too to be run by Arquillian too. Idea is like: @RunWith(ArquillianSuite.class) @Suite.SuiteClasses( { TestCase1.class, TestCase2.class, .... } ) public class AllTests{ @Deployment public static JavaArchive createTestArchive(){ return ShrinkWrap.create(JavaArchive.class,"test.jar"); } } The advantages of above approach for users of Arquillian framework are: - Test cases don't needed to be modified to have: "@RunWith(Arquillian.class)" annotation. In other words, test cases will be pure JUnit code, and no Arquillian code (results in less coding for end users). - It is not necessary to include the static "@Deployment" methods in all test cases any more, and only Test Suite need to define the archieving/deployment related setting/definitions. The advantage of above approach for framework itself is: - From performance point-of-view, it becomes possible for Arquillian to deploy all test cases in the Test Suite into J2EE container in one action (one deploy/undeploy for one test suite, instead of mulitple deploy/undeploy for each test case). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

5
5
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (ARQ-271) TestEnricher should be called in @BeforeClass as well

by Thomas Diesler (JIRA)

TestEnricher should be called in @BeforeClass as well ----------------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-271 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-271 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Thomas Diesler The TestEnricher API could be extended such that static fields can be initialized. @Inject public static BundleContext context; @BeforeClass public static void beforeClass() { System.out.println("BeforeClass: " + context); } There would be two calls to TestEnricher. #1 After test class load, but before a call to @BeforeClass. #2 After instantiation of the test class, but before a call to @Before (#2 is the current behaviour) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

4
10
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-618) ValidationException "DeploymentScenario contains targets not matching any defined Container in the registry." could be even more clear

by Geoffrey De Smet (Created) (JIRA)

ValidationException "DeploymentScenario contains targets not matching any defined Container in the registry." could be even more clear -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: ARQ-618 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-618 Project: Arquillian Issue Type: Enhancement Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Reporter: Geoffrey De Smet Priority: Minor I deployed to jetty 6 embedded and configured a container qualifier called "jetty-embedded". Instead of seeing this error message: {code} ValidationException: DeploymentScenario contains targets not matching any defined Container in the registry. _DEFAULT_. Possible causes are: No Deployable Container found on Classpath or your have defined a @org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.Deployment with a @org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.TargetsContainer value that does not match any found/configured Containers (see arquillian.xml container@qualifier) {code} I would like to see these error messages instead: if ContainerRegistry.getContainers() == 0 then {code} ValidationException: DeploymentScenario contains a target (_DEFAULT_) not matching any defined Container in the registry. Please include at least 1 Deployable Container in your Classpath. {code} otherwise {code} ValidationException: DeploymentScenario contains a target (_DEFAULT_) not matching any defined Container in the registry. Possible causes are: None of the 2 Deployable Containers on your Classpath match or you have defined a @org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.Deployment with a @org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.TargetsContainer of value (_DEFAULT_) that does not match any found/configured Containers (jboss-embedded, jetty-embedded), see arquillian.xml container@qualifier. {code} Every "()" part contains the runtime values. Here's the full original exception: {code} org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.client.deployment.ValidationException: DeploymentScenario contains targets not matching any defined Container in the registry. _DEFAULT_. Possible causes are: No Deployable Container found on Classpath or your have defined a @org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.Deployment with a @org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.api.TargetsContainer value that does not match any found/configured Containers (see arquillian.xml container@qualifier) at org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.client.deployment.DeploymentGenerator.validate(DeploymentGenerator.java:102) at org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.client.deployment.DeploymentGenerator.generateDeployment(DeploymentGenerator.java:84) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:99) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:81) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:134) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventImpl.fire(EventImpl.java:67) at org.jboss.arquillian.container.test.impl.client.ContainerEventController.execute(ContainerEventController.java:96) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.invokeObservers(EventContextImpl.java:99) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:81) at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createClassContext(TestContextHandler.java:68) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:88) at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.TestContextHandler.createSuiteContext(TestContextHandler.java:54) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ObserverImpl.invoke(ObserverImpl.java:90) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.EventContextImpl.proceed(EventContextImpl.java:88) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:134) at org.jboss.arquillian.core.impl.ManagerImpl.fire(ManagerImpl.java:114) at org.jboss.arquillian.test.impl.EventTestRunnerAdaptor.beforeClass(EventTestRunnerAdaptor.java:80) at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$2.evaluate(Arquillian.java:158) at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.multiExecute(Arquillian.java:290) at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.access$100(Arquillian.java:45) at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian$3.evaluate(Arquillian.java:175) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236) at org.jboss.arquillian.junit.Arquillian.run(Arquillian.java:123) at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157) at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:71) at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:199) at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:62) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:120) {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 8 months

3
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

arquillian-issues October 2011