[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
John Ament commented on ARQ-1555:
---------------------------------
The problem with using @ArquillianResource is that its value is a class, which you
currently use to determine which class's context to use (even though
@OperateOnDeployment uses a name - String). Hence why I was saying to use
@ArquillianRestClient or something like that, don't want to break core.
Rest Extension clients should be decoupled from RestEasy
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: ARQ-1555
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-1555
Project: Arquillian
Issue Type: Enhancement
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: Extension - REST
Reporter: John Ament
Priority: Minor
Currently, the annotation marking a REST client is
"ArquillianResteasyResource", this implies that the client framework can only
ever work with RestEasy. I would like to propose renaming this annotation
ArquillianRestClient, which clearily identifies it as being useful to any Rest Client
framework, and make it's clearer that it's a client API (not the resource itself).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira