[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2429) SQL Character Types Incorrectly mapped to Java objects
by Tyler Van Gorder (JIRA)
SQL Character Types Incorrectly mapped to Java objects
------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2429
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2429
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.1
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.1, Oracle10g
Reporter: Tyler Van Gorder
We have a work flow that allows the user to enter an arbitrary SQL statement to be executed by our application. We pass those queries through session.createSQLQuery().
We ran into a problem with String literals, which are reported by Oracle (ResultSetMetaData) to be CHAR. Reading the JDBC API, CHAR is a fixed length string. Hibernate is incorrectly mapping this to a Character field. We ended up overriding the Oracle dialect with our own as follows:
In our constructor, for a dialect that extends Oracle9iDialect:
super()
registerColumnType(Types.CHAR, "char($l)" );
registerHibernateType( Types.CHAR, Hibernate.STRING.getName() );
The HibernateType is the crucial one and we are overriding the behavior in the base "Dialect" class, so this appears that it would be a problem for all database variants that don't explicitly change this.
Thanks.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 2 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (EJB-276) Support for CLOB not working for DB2 when table per concrete class is being used
by breako (JIRA)
Support for CLOB not working for DB2 when table per concrete class is being used
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: EJB-276
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/EJB-276
Project: Hibernate Entity Manager
Type: Bug
Versions: 3.2.1
Reporter: breako
Hi,
This came up in the forums:
http://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?p=2344008#2344008
Sample code: Two Pojos
@Entity
public class Person {
private int i;
@Identity
public int getI() {
return i;
}
public void setI(int i){
this.i = i;
}
}
@Entity
public class Employee extends Person{
@Basic(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
@Lob
public String getClobAttr() {
return clobAttr;
}
public void setClobAttr(String clobAttr) {
this.clobAttr = clobAttr;
}
}
Simple test:
public static void main (String args[]) {
Query queryImpl = em.createQuery(" from Person");
List list = queryImpl.getResultList();
}
This will generate SQL
select person0_.clobAttr as clobAttr1 from (select nullif(0,0) as clobAttr from TPerson union all select clobAttr from TEmployee) person0_
which chucks the exception:
DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -415, SQLSTATE: 42825, SQLERRMC: null
I think the SQL hibernate should generate should be:
select person0_.clobAttr as clobAttr1 from (select cast(null as CLOB) as clobAttr from TPerson union all select clobAttr from TEmployee) person0_
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 3 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2955) Unnecessary version updates in two cases.
by Sławomir Wojtasiak (JIRA)
Unnecessary version updates in two cases.
-----------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2955
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2955
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.5
Environment: JDK 5.0
Reporter: Sławomir Wojtasiak
Attachments: HibernateTest.zip
I found two situations where hibernate generates unnecessary version updates. Let's illustrate it with a simple example:
Session session = SessionFactory.getSession();
Transaction transaction = session.getTransaction();
transaction.begin();
Article a = new Article();
a.setName( "atricle" );
*********************************************
*** Quantity is the owner of the relation ***
*********************************************
Quantity q = new Quantity();
q.setName( "quantity" );
q.setArticle( a );
a.getQuantities().add( q );
session.persist( a );
session.flush();
***** Hibernate generates following SQLs *****
Hibernate: select nextval ('hibernate_sequence')
Hibernate: select nextval ('hibernate_sequence')
Hibernate: insert into Article (name, version, id) values (?, ?, ?)
Hibernate: insert into Quantity (article_id, name, version, id) values (?, ?, ?, ?)
**********************************************
a.getQuantities().clear();
session.flush();
*** Hibernate generates following SQLs ***
Hibernate: update Article set name=?, version=? where id=? and version=?
This update of version field is performed because collection of quantities is marked as dirty, but Article entity is not relation owner so nothing change in database after this clear. Should it works like this? It looks like a bug because database remain unchanged so version changing is unnecessary in my opinion.
******************************************
session.clear();
**** SECOND PROBLEM ***
Now I generate true copy of persisted objects.
Notice that I use HashSet instead of PersistSet which was set during persist operation. This operation is similar to merging objects prepared by SOAP, during communication with remote client for example.
***********************
Article a1 = new Article();
a1.setId( a.getId() );
a1.setName( a.getName() );
a1.setVersion( a.getVersion() );
Quantity q1 = new Quantity();
q1.setArticle( a1 );
q1.setName( q.getName() );
q1.setVersion( q.getVersion() );
q1.setId( q.getId() );
a1.getQuantities().add( q1 );
a1 = (Article)session.merge( a1 );
session.flush();
***** This operation generates following SQLs *****
Hibernate: select article0_.id as id0_1_, article0_.name as name0_1_, article0_.version as version0_1_, quantities1_.article_id as article4_3_, quantities1_.id as id3_, quantities1_.id as id1_0_, quantities1_.article_id as article4_1_0_, quantities1_.name as name1_0_, quantities1_.version as version1_0_ from Article article0_ left outer join Quantity quantities1_ on article0_.id=quantities1_.article_id where article0_.id=?
Hibernate: update Article set name=?, version=? where id=? and version=?
It looks like problem is located in replaceElements() method of CollectgionType class (or somewhere near it). Maybe I'm wrong but this collection was checked for changes during merge operation (See this select above.) so why it remains dirty if it contains the same data as database?. I checked this issue on other JPA implementations (OpenJPA for example) and version is not incremented after similar merge operation.
*****************************************************
transaction.rollback();
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 4 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2225) NPE when eager fetching joined component with native SQL query
by Christian Bauer (JIRA)
NPE when eager fetching joined component with native SQL query
--------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2225
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2225
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: query-sql
Versions: 3.2.0.ga
Reporter: Christian Bauer
Priority: Minor
Item -> many-to-one -> User -> joined component -> billingAddress
This:
result = session.createSQLQuery("select {i.*}, {u.*}, {ba.*} from ITEM i" +
" join USERS u on i.SELLER_ID = u.USER_ID" +
" left join BILLING_ADDRESS ba on u.USER_ID = ba.USER_ID" +
" where u.USERNAME = :uname")
.addEntity("i", Item.class)
.addJoin("u", "i.seller")
.addJoin("ba", "u.billingAddress")
fails with:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.hibernate.loader.DefaultEntityAliases.<init>(DefaultEntityAliases.java:37)
at org.hibernate.loader.custom.sql.SQLQueryReturnProcessor.generateCustomReturns(SQLQueryReturnProcessor.java:283)
at org.hibernate.loader.custom.sql.SQLCustomQuery.<init>(SQLCustomQuery.java:129)
at org.hibernate.engine.query.NativeSQLQueryPlan.<init>(NativeSQLQueryPlan.java:43)
at org.hibernate.engine.query.QueryPlanCache.getNativeSQLQueryPlan(QueryPlanCache.java:114)
at org.hibernate.impl.AbstractSessionImpl.getNativeSQLQueryPlan(AbstractSessionImpl.java:137)
at org.hibernate.impl.AbstractSessionImpl.list(AbstractSessionImpl.java:142)
at org.hibernate.impl.SQLQueryImpl.list(SQLQueryImpl.java:150)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 4 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3028) Memory consumption when query cache is enabled
by Markus Heiden (JIRA)
Memory consumption when query cache is enabled
----------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3028
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3028
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: caching (L2), core
Affects Versions: 3.2.5
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.5, Oracle 9i
Reporter: Markus Heiden
As discussed in the hibernate-dev mailing list from 9.11.2007 to 12.11.2007 this bug describes a memory consumption issue which is located in ActionQueue/EntityAction.
Some snippets from ActionQueue:
private ArrayList executions;
public void execute(Executable executable) {
final boolean lockQueryCache = session.getFactory().getSettings().isQueryCacheEnabled();
if ( executable.hasAfterTransactionCompletion() || lockQueryCache ) {
executions.add( executable );
}
...
}
This code leads to a kind of memory leak, because if the "executable" is added to "executions", the related entity which is referenced from the "executable" is prevented from being garbage collected until the transaction ends. So if one needs to insert large amounts of transient objects in one transaction, there is no chance to get rid of the inserted objects by flushing and evicting them, if e.g. the query cache is enabled.
One solution to this problem might be to rework the above "if" condition to only add objects to "executions" if this is really needed. The problem is to determine when it is really needed.
Some snippets from EntityAction (which implements Executable):
private final Object instance;
public final Serializable getId() {
if ( id instanceof DelayedPostInsertIdentifier ) {
return session.getPersistenceContext().getEntry( instance ).getId();
}
return id;
}
public final Object getInstance() {
return instance;
}
Another solution might be to set the reference to the related entity (field "instance" in EntityAction) to null after flushing. This does not prevent "executions" from being filled, but the related entities might be garbage collected and so the memory consumption is acceptable. The problem is that subclasses of EntityAction use the "instance" field for post transaction work.
The are currently two workarounds to this problems:
1) To always disable the query cache
2) To use shorter transactions
Workaround 1 is not really acceptable, because it prohibits the use of a very useful feature.
Workaround 2 is sometimes acceptable but not wanted in most cases, because it breaks transactional safety.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 5 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2449) Lazy loading for one-to-one asociations
by jose (JIRA)
Lazy loading for one-to-one asociations
---------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2449
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2449
Project: Hibernate3
Type: New Feature
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.2
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.2
Reporter: jose
After read "Some explanations on lazy loading" and my tests I found a lossing feature in Hibernate (3.2.2).
one-to-one with lazy="proxy"_____________________________________________
Hibernate ALWAYS launch selects to know if one-to-one is null or can be proxied.
one-to-one with lazy="no-proxy"__________________________________________
Instrumentation allows to hibernate modify the getter to allows lazy loading on demand:
* but allways initialize ALL no-proxy relations (with first getter call)
-> must initialize ONLY the requested property
* never auto-initialize FETCH joins, ALWAYS doit on demand (if opened session)
-> must auto-initialize ONLY the FETCHED property
note: Can submit a fix for this? How?
NEW FEATURE: one-to-one with lazy="proxy" without multiple SELECTS______
If Hibernate adds join, for all one-to-one relations, to get the foreign-key of other tables, can check it to create a proxy or null.
note: that hibernate adds joins for hierarchy, why not for one-to-one relations?
This solution avoids:
* 'multiple subselects' after first select
* 'instrumentation' of bytecode
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 5 months