July 2007 - hibernate-issues - Jboss List Archives

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2626) Bug in handling null references to Components / Embeddables when using session / entityManager.merge()

by Michael Plöd (JIRA)

Bug in handling null references to Components / Embeddables when using session / entityManager.merge() ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: HHH-2626 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2626 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 3.2.4.sp1, 3.2.4, 3.2.3 Environment: Hibernate 3.2.3 - 3.2.4.sp1; Any Database Reporter: Michael Plöd Priority: Critical Attachments: patch.txt, TestCase.zip I found a bug, that got introduced by adding functionality to the class TypeFactory in Hibernate 3.2.3. The Method TypeFactory#replaceAssociations(...) now has some special handling regarding components / embeddables. But if such a component is null, wich is fair enough, Hibernate will provoke a NullPointerException in sun.reflect.UnsafeFieldAccessorImpl.ensureObj(...): Exception in thread "main" javax.persistence.PersistenceException: org.hibernate.PropertyAccessException: could not get a field value by reflection getter of de.ploed.test.MonetaryAmount.amount at org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.throwPersistenceException(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:647) at org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.merge(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:236) at de.ploed.test.EntityManagerTest.main(EntityManagerTest.java:22) Caused by: org.hibernate.PropertyAccessException: could not get a field value by reflection getter of de.ploed.test.MonetaryAmount.amount at org.hibernate.property.DirectPropertyAccessor$DirectGetter.get(DirectPropertyAccessor.java:35) at org.hibernate.tuple.component.AbstractComponentTuplizer.getPropertyValue(AbstractComponentTuplizer.java:64) at org.hibernate.tuple.component.AbstractComponentTuplizer.getPropertyValues(AbstractComponentTuplizer.java:70) at org.hibernate.tuple.component.PojoComponentTuplizer.getPropertyValues(PojoComponentTuplizer.java:83) at org.hibernate.type.ComponentType.getPropertyValues(ComponentType.java:353) at org.hibernate.type.ComponentType.getPropertyValues(ComponentType.java:348) at org.hibernate.type.TypeFactory.replaceAssociations(TypeFactory.java:556) at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultMergeEventListener.copyValues(DefaultMergeEventListener.java:366) at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultMergeEventListener.entityIsTransient(DefaultMergeEventListener.java:195) at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultMergeEventListener.onMerge(DefaultMergeEventListener.java:123) at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultMergeEventListener.onMerge(DefaultMergeEventListener.java:53) at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.fireMerge(SessionImpl.java:677) at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.merge(SessionImpl.java:661) at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.merge(SessionImpl.java:665) at org.hibernate.ejb.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.merge(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:227) ... 1 more Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at sun.reflect.UnsafeFieldAccessorImpl.ensureObj(UnsafeFieldAccessorImpl.java:36) at sun.reflect.UnsafeObjectFieldAccessorImpl.get(UnsafeObjectFieldAccessorImpl.java:18) at java.lang.reflect.Field.get(Field.java:357) at org.hibernate.property.DirectPropertyAccessor$DirectGetter.get(DirectPropertyAccessor.java:32) ... 15 more I think that the handling of target[i] in Line 556 of org.hibernate.type.TypeFactory is not null safe. I have created a patch for this and the bug above appears to be fixed in this patch. In my humble opinion this bug makes it impossible to merge any entity / value object containing a null reference to another value object. However this bug is not present when using session.save or session.saveOrUpdate. I was able to reproduce the bug in Hibernate Core 3.2.4.sp1, 3.2.4 and 3.2.3 .. It is not present in Hibernate Core Versions <= 3.2.2 Attached to this task are the following files: patch.txt - my patch proposal TestCase.zip - Test Case Please get back to me if you have any further questions! Cheers, Mike -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

3
5
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HBX-826) Code generator: sortedset are not instantiated by default

by Julien Fourment (JIRA)

Code generator: sortedset are not instantiated by default ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HBX-826 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HBX-826 Project: Hibernate Tools Type: Bug Components: hbm2java Versions: 3.1beta3 Environment: Hibernate 3.1.3 and plus. MySQL 5.0 Reporter: Julien Fourment Priority: Minor Hi, When defining a regular (not sorted) set in an hbm file, the generated java will define the field as this: private Set<Package> packages = new HashSet<Package>(0); But when defining a sorted set in the my hbm file (using sort attribute with a comparator class) the generated java looks like this: private SortedSet<ServiceVersion> versions; Type is correct, but the field in not populated with a default implementation by default, like treeset ? I would expect something like : private SortedSet<ServiceVersion> versions = new TreeSet<ServiceVersion>(new myComparator()); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HBX-825) hbm2java: Circular dependency between POJO source generation and Comparator class compilation

by Julien Fourment (JIRA)

hbm2java: Circular dependency between POJO source generation and Comparator class compilation --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HBX-825 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HBX-825 Project: Hibernate Tools Type: Bug Components: hbm2java Versions: 3.1beta3 Environment: Hibernate 3.1.3 and +. Using MySQL 5.0 Reporter: Julien Fourment Attachments: example_and_traces.zip Hi, My java objects are generated from the xml files using hbm2java. One of my collection is sorted using a Comparator class. hbm2java fails saying the comparator cannot be instantiated. But as the comparator makes reference to my java object, it cannot be compiled before the generation happened. We have a circular dependency here. (see example enclosed). Is there any way to fix this ? Many thanks ! -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2517) org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaExport create() method drop tables before creation

by Oleg Byelkin (JIRA)

org.hibernate.tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaExport create() method drop tables before creation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2517 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2517 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Bug Versions: 3.2.2 Reporter: Oleg Byelkin Priority: Minor IMO slightly unexpected behavior. The method should just create tables and foreign keys. Besides, in previous Hibernate versions that method just create tables. If you are agree with me, pls. fix it as: public void create(boolean script, boolean export) { execute(script, export, false, TRUE); } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2488) Resolution of filters' conditions should be postponed till all mappings are loaded.

by Dmitry Katsubo (JIRA)

Resolution of filters' conditions should be postponed till all mappings are loaded. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2488 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2488 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Bug Components: core Versions: 3.2.2 Environment: Hibernate-Version: 3.2.2.ga Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-b105) Reporter: Dmitry Katsubo When trying to use the possibility to define the conditions for the same filters in {{<filter-def>}}, the following exception occurs, as the resolution of conditions should be done at a later stage, after all mappings are loaded: {noformat} Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at org.hibernate.cfg.HbmBinder.parseFilter(HbmBinder.java:2931) at org.hibernate.cfg.HbmBinder.bindCollection(HbmBinder.java:1462) at org.hibernate.cfg.HbmBinder$2.create(HbmBinder.java:2757) {noformat} The example of definition, that uses filters: {code:xml|title=clauses.hbm.xml|borderStyle=solid} <class name="ClauseFolderImpl" table="stc_folders"> <id name="id"> <generator class="native" /> </id> <property name="name" not-null="true" /> <property name="private" not-null="true" /> <set name="subFolders" outer-join="false" cascade="none"> <key column="parentId" /> <one-to-many class="ClauseFolderImpl" /> <filter name="folderFilterLimited" /> <filter name="folderFilter" /> </set> <filter name="folderFilterLimited" /> <filter name="folderFilter" /> </class> <filter-def name="folderFilterLimited" condition="(parentId is null or (languageId = :languageId and procedureTypeId = :procedureTypeId))" > <filter-param name="languageId" type="int" /> <filter-param name="procedureTypeId" type="int" /> </filter-def> <filter-def name="folderFilter" condition="(parentId is null or private = :isPrivate)"> <filter-param name="isPrivate" type="boolean" /> </filter-def> {code} As Hibernate ues DTD to check the validity of configuration file, the {{<filter-def>}} definitions can't be moved to the beginning of the configuration file. The possible walkaround is to define filters in another file, and include it first: {code:xml|title=hibernate-configuration.xml|borderStyle=solid} <hibernate-configuration> <session-factory> ... <mapping resource="filters.hbm.xml"/>  <mapping resource="clauses.hbm.xml"/> ... </session-factory> </hibernate-configuration> {code} Relative issue is [http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1182#action... HHH-1182]. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2156) Section 19.3, "Managing the caches" doesn't document CacheMode.IGNORE

by Anders Wallgren (JIRA)

Section 19.3, "Managing the caches" doesn't document CacheMode.IGNORE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2156 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2156 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Bug Components: metamodel Versions: 3.2.0.ga Reporter: Anders Wallgren CacheMode.IGNORE is used in other sections, but is not documented in Section 19.3, along with the other CacheModes. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

2
3
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2189) Left Outer Join Conditions

by yann degat (JIRA)

Left Outer Join Conditions -------------------------- Key: HHH-2189 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2189 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Bug Components: query-sql Versions: 3.1.3 Reporter: yann degat Priority: Blocker Attachments: OracleJoinFragment.java, OracleJoinFragment.java the "org.hibernate.sql.OracleJoinFragment.addLeftOuterJoinCondition" does not take the "!=" operator into account. it places the "(+)" like this "!(+)=" instead of " (+) !=" ( != is a valid operator for Oracle ) and it returns (+)<(+)> for the '<>' operator here's a patch. (maybe not the best one ) /** * This method is a bit of a hack, and assumes * that the column on the "right" side of the * join appears on the "left" side of the * operator, which is extremely wierd if this * was a normal join condition, but is natural * for a filter. */ private void addLeftOuterJoinCondition(String on) { StringBuffer buf = new StringBuffer( on ); for ( int i = 0; i < buf.length(); i++ ) { char character = buf.charAt( i ); boolean isInsertPoint = OPERATORS.contains( new Character( character ) ) || ( character == ' ' && buf.length() > i + 3 && "is ".equals( buf.substring( i + 1, i + 4 ) ) ) ; if( character == '<' && buf.length() > i + 1 && ">".equals( buf.substring( i + 1, i + 2 ) ) ){ isInsertPoint = false; buf.insert( i, "(+)" ); i += 3 + 2; } if ( isInsertPoint ) { buf.insert( i, "(+)" ); i += 3; } if( character == '!' && buf.length() > i + 1 && "=".equals( buf.substring( i + 1, i + 2 ) ) ){ buf.insert( i, "(+)" ); i += 3 + 2; } } addCondition( buf.toString() ); } -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

3
3
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2503) AbstractEntityPersister swallows JDBCExceptions in processGeneratedProperties

by Dag Liodden (JIRA)

AbstractEntityPersister swallows JDBCExceptions in processGeneratedProperties ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2503 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2503 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Bug Components: core Versions: 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3 Environment: 3.2.2GA and trunk Reporter: Dag Liodden Seems to be a small typo on line 3718 in AbstractEntityPersister (trunk and 3.2.2 GA) which makes exceptions during property generation being logged but not thrown: catch( SQLException sqle ) { JDBCExceptionHelper.convert( getFactory().getSQLExceptionConverter(), sqle, "unable to select generated column values", selectionSQL ); There should be a throw in there I guess. :) catch( SQLException sqle ) { throw JDBCExceptionHelper.convert( getFactory().getSQLExceptionConverter(), sqle, "unable to select generated column values", selectionSQL ); This bug will not be noticeable in most cases and is probably why it hasn't been detected / fixed so far. The method in question (processGeneratedProperties) is used for retrieving properties that are marked as "generated" in the mapping document / annotations - in other words any value that the database provides and is considered "read-only" from the Hibernate application's point of view. The generated value is retrieved by an extra select statement executed by Hibernate after an entity has been inserterd and / or updated (according to how the generated property is flagged). In my particular case, a property (not a key) is marked as generated="insert", so after Hibernate inserts a new entity to the database, it will immediately do a select and set the generated property to the value the database returns. Only in rare cases will this select fail in any way - in fact, I cannot think of any situations other than mapping errors (e.g getInt on a CHAR column) that can cause errors in this last select. That is in addition to my situation - a deadlock. My entity class uses uuid.hex generator for the PK, but at one point, we introduced a second unique key due to purely aestethic reasons. This is a SQL Server identity column. Since we don't do any explicit table locking during the inserts, we end up with deadlocks every time the following happens: T1: INSERT INTO TABLE (ID) values (?) T2: INSERT INTO TABLE (ID) values (?) T2: SELECT GENERATED_ID FROM TABLE WHERE ID = ? -- T1's insert hasn't been committed, so what should the the generated ID be? Deadlock! T1: SELECT GENERATED_ID FROM TABLE WHERE ID = ? ... SQL Server throws an error to indicate the deadlock, but due to the missing throw in the processGeneratedProperties-method, it is never shown to the process doing the insert. The generated property is not set and retains it's null (or 0 in case of a primitive) without the business logic ever knowing that the entity could not be saved. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

2
4
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2320) Regression: optional properties under a <join> tag no longer update properly

by Chris Jones (JIRA)

Regression: optional properties under a <join> tag no longer update properly ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2320 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2320 Project: Hibernate3 Type: Bug Components: core Versions: 3.2.1, 3.2.0.cr4, 3.2.0.ga, 3.2.0.cr5 Environment: hibernate 3.2.0.cr4 through 3.2.1.ga hsql 1.8.0.7 and Oracle 9i Reporter: Chris Jones This was specifically introduced with the revision 10217 changes on the 3.2 branch in src/org/hibernate/persister/entity/AbstractEntityPersister.java Given the following setup: <class name="Thing"> <id .../> <join table="JOIN_TABLE" optional="true"> <key column="THING_ID" not-null="true"/> <property name="joinedProperty" column="JOINED_PROPERTY"/> </join> </class> scenario: Thing thing1 = new Thing(); thing1.setJoinedProperty("thing1"); save(thing1); // a record in the JOIN_TABLE is created properly and updates on the property can occur Thing thing2 = new Thing(); thing2.setJoinedProperty(null); save(thing2); // no record in JOIN_TABLE is created thing2.setJoinedProperty("thing2"); save(thing2); // in revision 10216, hibernate correctly runs an INSERT to create a JOIN_TABLE record with the value "thing2" // in revision 10217, hibernate incorrectly runs an UPDATE to try and update a non-existant record in the JOIN_TABLE with the thing2 id It looks like the expectation.verifyOutcome() method should be throwing a StaleStateException if the attempted update effects 0 rows. I will try and get an official hibernate testcase going and possibly a patch, but I wanted to enter this now in case there is something I'm missing that makes this change in functionality intentional. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

2
8
0 / 0

[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2591) MySQL 5.0.12+ JOIN Syntax Changed

by Brian Rozmierski (JIRA)

MySQL 5.0.12+ JOIN Syntax Changed --------------------------------- Key: HHH-2591 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2591 Project: Hibernate3 Issue Type: Bug Components: query-hql, query-sql Affects Versions: 3.2.3, 3.2.1 Environment: Tested with Hibernate Core 3.2.1 and 3.2.3, MySQL 5.0.27, 5.0.33, 5.0.37 Reporter: Brian Rozmierski Priority: Critical With 5.0.12 MySQL changed the JOIN syntax to be SQL:2003 compliant. (See MySQL 5.0.12 Release Notes at http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/news-5-0-12.html and JOIN syntax information at http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/join.html for more information) Previous to this change the following query was valid: SELECT * FROM t1, t2 JOIN t3 ON (t1.i1 = t3.i3); Now it must be written as: SELECT * FROM (t1, t2) JOIN t3 ON (t1.i1 = t3.i3); or SELECT * FROM t1 JOIN t2 JOIN t3 ON (t1.i1 = t3.i3); -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.... - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

17 years, 4 months

2
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

hibernate-issues July 2007