[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3230) getEntityName() throws org.hibernate.TransientObjectException: proxy was not associated with the session
by Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)
getEntityName() throws org.hibernate.TransientObjectException: proxy was not associated with the session
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3230
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3230
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.2
Environment: Mac OS X, JDK 1.5
Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
I'm retrieving an entity that contains a OneToMany relationship.
The master entity is retrieved, within a transaction, via Session.get(Class,Serializable).
@Entity
public class MapUnitSurvey extends ActiveDO
{
@ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
private VegetationType vegetationType;
}
@Entity
public class VegetationType extends AbstractEnum
{
}
ActiveDO and AbstractEnum are abstract base classes with @MappedSuperclass.
I retrieve the vegationType:
VegetationType type = survey.getVegetationType();
Then I need the type's entity name
String entityName = session.getEntityName(type);
This fails with the TransientObjectException.
Inspecting with the debugger, I see that type is a CGLIB-enhanced proxy, and that there's a fully initialized bean in the target field of the proxy. I'll attach a screenshot of some debugging data.
In summary; the entity was retrieved via a lazy fetch, appears the be correct, seems to be in the session and yet the exception occurs.
I've tried to resolve this by re-fetching the object from the session, and a few other tries, with no luck.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3332) Hibernate duplicate then child entity's on merge
by Rodrigo de Assumpção (JIRA)
Hibernate duplicate then child entity's on merge
------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3332
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3332
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.2.6
Environment: JDK 1.6
Oracle 9i
Hibernate 3.2.6
Hibernate Annotations 3.3.1
Hibernate EntityManager 3.3.2
Standalone Running
Reporter: Rodrigo de Assumpção
Priority: Critical
The method merge from EntityManager causes a duplication of child entity's.
class Father:
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "father", cascade={CascadeType.ALL}, fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
private List<Child> childList;
class Child:
@ManyToOne @JoinColumn(name = "ID_FATHER")
private Father father;
class BugTest
EntityManagerFactory emf = Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("JpaTestHB");
EntityManager em = emf.createEntityManager();
Father f = (Father) em.createQuery("SELECT f FROM Father f WHERE f.id = 1").getSingleResult();
Child c = new Child();
c.setFather(f);
f.getChildList().add(c);
em.getTransaction().begin();
em.merge(f);
em.getTransaction().commit();
The execution of BugTest Class causes tow insert's on table "child".
If you change the fetch mode to EAGER (into Father class) the problem not occurs.
I make the same test with Toplink, and it make a unique insert, normal.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-5280) "java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: object is not an instance of declaring class" when persisting a object graph containing the same transient objetc twice.
by Benjamin Lerman (JIRA)
"java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: object is not an instance of declaring class" when persisting a object graph containing the same transient objetc twice.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-5280
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5280
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.5.2
Environment: Hibernate 3.5.2
Db: All? (At least h2 and mysql)
Reporter: Benjamin Lerman
Priority: Critical
Attachments: hibernate-multi-parent.tgz, test.entity.TestCreate.txt
I attach a maven project showing the bug.
I have 3 classes, A, B, C with
C have a one-to-many unidirectional relation to B and A.
B have a one-to-many unidirectional relation to A.
Those relations are mapped by foreign keys.
The cascading properties for those relations are all save-update,persist
For each of those relations, the inverse cardinality is 1 (which means A must be associated with a B and a C, and B must be associated with a C).
I create an instance of C that I associate to an instance of B and an instance of A, and I associate the instance of B with the instance of A.
I then try to save C, and I get the attached exception.
For what I understood the problem is with the method StatefulPersistenceContext.getOwnerId: this method use a cache to retrieve the parent of the instance of A, but because A has 2 different parents (the instance of B and the instance of C), it does not retrieve the right one and try to call a method on the wrong entity.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3608) DB sequence numbers are not unique when using the pooled SequenceStyleGenerator in multiple JVMs with the same DB
by Matthias Gommeringer (JIRA)
DB sequence numbers are not unique when using the pooled SequenceStyleGenerator in multiple JVMs with the same DB
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3608
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.3.1, 3.3.0.SP1, 3.3.0.GA, 3.2.6
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.6, Oracle (any version)
Reporter: Matthias Gommeringer
Priority: Blocker
Attachments: PooledOptimizerTest.java
We have several Application Servers (=JVMs) running each of them using Hibernate-Objects with the SequenceStyleGenerator+pooled configured. In unpredictable time intervals it happens that hibernate assigns the same ID to two completely different objects which results in a UniqueConstraintViolation exception from the database. Here an example with a description where hibernate fails:
DB-Sequence setup:
start=0
increment=2
PooledOptimizer.generate() with 2 threads (first assignment of hiValue/value):
JVM-1 JVM-2
value=0=callback.nextval
value=2=callback.nextval
hiValue=4=callback.nextval
hiValue=6=callback.nextval
The problem's cause is in the PooledOptimizer.generate: when it initializes
the value+hiValue for the first time it invokes callback.nextValue() twice which
may provide values that do not belong to each other. The reason is that
between the assignment of "value" and "hiValue" another JVM can retrieve a
DB sequence value from the callback which leads to an inconsistent "value" and "hiValue"
relation (see example above).
A fix that works for multiple JVMs would be to invoke the "callback.getNextValue()" maximum once
per "optimizer.generate()" call:
public synchronized Serializable generate(AccessCallback callback) {
if ( hiValue < 0 ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
hiValue = value + incrementSize;
}
else if ( value >= hiValue ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
hiValue = value + incrementSize;
}
return make(value++);
}
I attached a testcase that prooves the described problem (you can see that the IDs "2" and "3" are assigned two times).
I would be very thankful if this problem could be fixed very soon since it is a showstopper which
occurs very unpredictably.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3551) Boolean substitution in informix
by Rouvignac (JIRA)
Boolean substitution in informix
--------------------------------
Key: HHH-3551
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3551
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: query-sql
Affects Versions: 3.3.1
Environment: Hibernate 3.2
Informix 9.40
Reporter: Rouvignac
HQL Query :
select order from Order order where order.printed = ?
Parameter :
true, false, Boolean.TRUE or Boolean.FALSE
When the request is executed we get the following error :
SQLSTATE: IX000
SQL CODE: -674
674: Routine (equal) can not be resolved.
If as parameter we use "t" ot "f" everything works fine but it will not work with other DB.
As a workaround we can use :
property name="hibernate.query.substitutions">true t, false f</property>
I investigated in Dialects :
Dialect.java
public String toBooleanValueString(boolean bool) {
return bool ? "1" : "0";
}
PostgreSQLDialect.java
public String toBooleanValueString(boolean bool) {
return bool ? "true" : "false";
}
InformixDialect.java uses Dialect.java toBooleanValueString method.
In my mind toBooleanValueString should be added to InformixDialect.java as follow :
public String toBooleanValueString(boolean bool) {
return bool ? "t" : "f";
}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-4511) Problems with polymorphic queries with SINGLE_TABLE inheritance strategy
by Karoly Gacsal (JIRA)
Problems with polymorphic queries with SINGLE_TABLE inheritance strategy
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-4511
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-4511
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: envers
Affects Versions: 3.5.0.Beta-1
Environment: envers 1.2.1
Hibernate 3.3.2
Reporter: Karoly Gacsal
Attachments: ChildAuditing.java
Inheritance strategy is SINGLE_TABLE (discriminator).
When I query for ParentType I do not get ChildType instances in the result, but ParentType instances.
I checked the problem against envers 1.2.1/Hibernate 3.3.2 and against Hibernate 3.5.0.Beta-1 too.
The testcase "\src\test\java\org\hibernate\envers\test\integration\inheritance\single\ChildAuditing.java"
passes, but when I change the two sides of the equals method in testPolymorphicQuery()'s second assert the testcase fails, because
the expected result is a ChildEntity, but in the result we get an instance of ParentEntity.
Attached you can find the testcases changed by me.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
13 years, 11 months