[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608?page=c...
]
Steve Ebersole commented on HHH-3608:
-------------------------------------
Bjorn, I think the issue is whenever the value retrieved from the sequence is the
"start with" value, which might be zero (hsqldb's default start-with, one
(the default start-with on most dbs), or any other number (I used to regularly define
start-with to provide a gap for manual insertion of "static data").
But I think it is reasonable to require the developer to specify starts-with to account
for this even if not expecting it be used for actual creation. Then we can just assume:
{code}
public synchronized Serializable generate(AccessCallback callback) {
if ( hiValue == null ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
...
// START CHANGE
if ( ( initialValue == -1 && value.lt( incrementSize ) ) || value.eq(
initialValue.longValue() ) ) {
// the call to obtain next-value just gave us the initialValue
hiValue = callback.getNextValue();
}
else {
hiValue = value;
value = hiValue.copy().subtract( incrementSize );
}
// END CHANGE
}
...
{code}
As for the formatting, wrap your code in {noformat}
{code}
// your code here
{code}
{noformat} tags.
DB sequence numbers are not unique when using the pooled
SequenceStyleGenerator in multiple JVMs with the same DB
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3608
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.6, 3.3.0.GA, 3.3.0.SP1, 3.3.1
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.6, Oracle (any version)
Reporter: Matthias Gommeringer
Assignee: Steve Ebersole
Attachments: CustomPooledOptimizer.java, PooledOptimizerTest.java
Time Spent: 2h
Remaining Estimate: 0h
We have several Application Servers (=JVMs) running each of them using Hibernate-Objects
with the SequenceStyleGenerator+pooled configured. In unpredictable time intervals it
happens that hibernate assigns the same ID to two completely different objects which
results in a UniqueConstraintViolation exception from the database. Here an example with a
description where hibernate fails:
DB-Sequence setup:
start=0
increment=2
PooledOptimizer.generate() with 2 threads (first assignment of hiValue/value):
JVM-1 JVM-2
value=0=callback.nextval
value=2=callback.nextval
hiValue=4=callback.nextval
hiValue=6=callback.nextval
The problem's cause is in the PooledOptimizer.generate: when it initializes
the value+hiValue for the first time it invokes callback.nextValue() twice which
may provide values that do not belong to each other. The reason is that
between the assignment of "value" and "hiValue" another JVM can
retrieve a
DB sequence value from the callback which leads to an inconsistent "value" and
"hiValue"
relation (see example above).
A fix that works for multiple JVMs would be to invoke the
"callback.getNextValue()" maximum once
per "optimizer.generate()" call:
public synchronized Serializable generate(AccessCallback callback) {
if ( hiValue < 0 ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
hiValue = value + incrementSize;
}
else if ( value >= hiValue ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
hiValue = value + incrementSize;
}
return make(value++);
}
I attached a testcase that prooves the described problem (you can see that the IDs
"2" and "3" are assigned two times).
I would be very thankful if this problem could be fixed very soon since it is a
showstopper which
occurs very unpredictably.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira