]
Steve Ebersole updated HHH-3809:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0.Beta2)
4.0.0.next
Improve Memory Management when Post Commit Listeners are enabled
----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3809
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3809
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.3.1
Environment: N/A
Reporter: Shawn Clowater
Fix For: 4.0.0.next
Attachments: HHH-5309Option1.patch
This is somewhat related to the QueryCache behavior reported under
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3028
In this particular case however, it is the fact that when the session factory is
configured to have post commit listeners it prevents the garbage collection of any entity
that is modified during the session due to the fact that it is referenced in the
executions list in the ActionQueue class. This makes any type of memory management by
flushing/clearing the session ineffective if you're in the middle of a large batch
that is inserting or updating a large amount of data.
i.e in our case we have 4 entities out of possibly 300 or so that we want to notify
external systems if they change. However, by simply having the listeners defined they
essentially block the remaining entities in the executions.
A potential workaround I guess might be to keep 2 session factories around with a
different set of listeners but that seems a bit dirty.
There are 2.5 potential ways that I can think of that might address this.
1 - Have some sort of flag on the session to disable the post commit listeners. The onus
would be on the user of the session to disable the listeners in the case where they know
they aren't modifying anything that will need post commit handling.
2 - Add the ability to configure the post commit listeners by entity
a)With polymorphism - i.e. you could add a listener based on Object.class and it would
apply to all entities and would behave much like it does now. You could also configure to
Animal.class and would include Cat and Dog.
b)Without polymorphism - you could add a listener based on a specific entity class and it
would only apply to that particular one. You would have an option to specify a null
entity and it would default to what is there today.
In my miind, 2a is probably the best albeit slightly more complex to implement but I
think would be a good value add.
I don't mind submitting a patch assuming that I'm not so far in left field that I
should be committed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: