[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608?page=c...
]
Matthias Gommeringer commented on HHH-3608:
-------------------------------------------
Hi Steve,
thanks for reading this and for your reply (finally ;-) )
I do not agree (or not understand) with your statement:
>>>
... The second select bumps the "current
value" in the sequence to 11...
<<<<
My understanding is as follows:
DB sequence starts with 1 increment by 10
Obtaining next value for the first time will bump DB sequence to 11 reserving 1-10 for
hibernate. With the second select the "current value" will be bumped to 21.
Furthermore my understanding of DB sequences is that they guarantee to generate unique
numbers for several different users.
Excerpt from
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B13789_01/server.101/b10759/stateme...:
<<Use the CREATE SEQUENCE statement to create a sequence, which is a database object
from which multiple users may generate unique integers.>>
So if sequences are properly used the DB guarantees that there are no duplicates. Sorry,
but I'm still convinced that this is a bug. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
But luckily a custom optimizer can be registered with hibernate :-)
DB sequence numbers are not unique when using the pooled
SequenceStyleGenerator in multiple JVMs with the same DB
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3608
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.6, 3.3.0.GA, 3.3.0.SP1, 3.3.1
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.6, Oracle (any version)
Reporter: Matthias Gommeringer
Priority: Blocker
Attachments: CustomPooledOptimizer.java, PooledOptimizerTest.java
We have several Application Servers (=JVMs) running each of them using Hibernate-Objects
with the SequenceStyleGenerator+pooled configured. In unpredictable time intervals it
happens that hibernate assigns the same ID to two completely different objects which
results in a UniqueConstraintViolation exception from the database. Here an example with a
description where hibernate fails:
DB-Sequence setup:
start=0
increment=2
PooledOptimizer.generate() with 2 threads (first assignment of hiValue/value):
JVM-1 JVM-2
value=0=callback.nextval
value=2=callback.nextval
hiValue=4=callback.nextval
hiValue=6=callback.nextval
The problem's cause is in the PooledOptimizer.generate: when it initializes
the value+hiValue for the first time it invokes callback.nextValue() twice which
may provide values that do not belong to each other. The reason is that
between the assignment of "value" and "hiValue" another JVM can
retrieve a
DB sequence value from the callback which leads to an inconsistent "value" and
"hiValue"
relation (see example above).
A fix that works for multiple JVMs would be to invoke the
"callback.getNextValue()" maximum once
per "optimizer.generate()" call:
public synchronized Serializable generate(AccessCallback callback) {
if ( hiValue < 0 ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
hiValue = value + incrementSize;
}
else if ( value >= hiValue ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
hiValue = value + incrementSize;
}
return make(value++);
}
I attached a testcase that prooves the described problem (you can see that the IDs
"2" and "3" are assigned two times).
I would be very thankful if this problem could be fixed very soon since it is a
showstopper which
occurs very unpredictably.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira