[hibernate-issues] [Hibernate-JIRA] Commented: (HHH-2007) Hibernate doesn't support optional one-to-one associations

Hibernate doesn't support optional one-to-one associations ---------------------------------------------------------- Key: HHH-2007 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2007 Project: Hibernate Core Issue Type: Bug Components: core Affects Versions: 3.2.0.cr2 Reporter: Andrei Iltchenko Hibernate doesn't properly support optional one-to-one associations, e.g. Person (0..1) -- (0..1) Passport. The Hibernate books and reference all talk of two ways of mapping one-to-one associations: 1. using a many-to-one fk association with a unique constraint on the fk; 2. using a pk association. the trouble with both of them is that they enforce the mandatory property of an association end, which sometimes is not desirable. The first way enforces the mandatory property with the uniqueness constraint on the fk, the other by using the fact that one table's pk is its fk. I tried to see if I could adapt the 1st way of representing one-to-ones to support optional association ends. What I did was simply remove the unique and not null constrains from DDL generated (without removing it it would be impossible to have a Person record that doesn't reference a Passport record): from CREATE TABLE Person ( PassUniqueId VARCHAR (32) NOT NULL, version INTEGER NOT NULL, uniqueId VARCHAR (32) NOT NULL, name VARCHAR (40) NULL, PRIMARY KEY (uniqueId), UNIQUE(PassUniqueId), FOREIGN KEY (PassUniqueId) REFERENCES Passport (uniqueId) ); to CREATE TABLE Person ( PassUniqueId VARCHAR (32) NULL, version INTEGER NOT NULL, uniqueId VARCHAR (32) NOT NULL, name VARCHAR (40) NULL, PRIMARY KEY (uniqueId), FOREIGN KEY (PassUniqueId) REFERENCES Passport (uniqueId) ); but leave the uniqueness attribute in the mapping file: <many-to-one name="pass" class="application.business.logic.Passport" cascade="save-update,merge" unique="true" > <column name="PassUniqueId"/> </many-to-one> The resulting solution worked fine and I was able to create instances of Person not linked to a Passport. However Hibernate didn't succed in keeping the association from degrading into a many-to-one. It enabled me to create two Persons linked with the same Passport: PASSUNIQUEID | VIRSION | UNIQUEID | Name ================================================ 0d8b3919fffff | 1 | 0d5fb1dcfff | John 0d8b3919fffff | 0 | 10fd07bdfff | Sam A subsequent attempt at retrieving such Persons with Hibernate failed: org.hibernate.HibernateException: More than one row with the given identifier was found: 0d8b3919ffffffd60151e135b6da0164, for class: application.business.logic.Passport. Hibernate should be able to impose the single end property of such associations without relying on the underlying RDBMS engine and never allow them to degrade to many-to-ones.