[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5275?page=c...
]
Steve Ebersole commented on HHH-5275:
-------------------------------------
To be honest, this "alias specific locking" stuff was all added to support JPAQL
which defines support for this. I know its probably asking too much that a JCP spec
actually be detailed enough to get into details like this, but I'll have to go back
and follow whatever guidance they provide in this regard. I'll comment back with what
I find.
Criteria.setLockMode does not work correctly
--------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-5275
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-5275
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.5.2, 3.5.3
Environment: Hibernate 3.5.2, Oracle 10 (using
org.hibernate.dialect.Oracle10gDialect
Reporter: Björn Moritz
Assignee: Steve Ebersole
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.0.1
Attachments: AnotherOracle10gDialect.java, My_Oracle10Dialect.java,
My_Oracle10Dialect.java, TestCase.zip
Time Spent: 2h 19m
The LockMode set via Criteria.setLockMode does not generate a ' for update' SQL
statement. In the org.hibernate.dialect.Dialect class only the LockOptions are used for
determining a possible addition to the SQL statement if using pessimistic locking. This
behaviour is different from Hibernate 3.1.3.
In the supplied TestCase two threads are reading the same database record; one of those
threads should use pessimistic locking thereby blocking the other thread. But both threads
can read the database record causing the test to fail.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira