[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2235?page=c...
]
Ulf gohde commented on HHH-2235:
--------------------------------
Obviously you need a primary key if you want to use it in a relation via foreign key. The
table in that example has no relation to other tables...
"You can't identify what you don't know". What are you talking about? If
I know that a column can have a null value, then I know it. The example is not broken
Given the above example data like below is completely valid and the first 2 columns are
uniquely identifying a row.
1 released blob
1 draft another blob
2 null yet another blob
Support for null map-keys in <map> mappings
-------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2235
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2235
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.0.ga
Reporter: Igor Lobanov
Priority: Minor
I'm not sure if I should file it as a bug.
Hibernate requires index column for <map> mappings to be not null. This is required
by the code in AbstractCollectionPersister#readIndex(...), which raises exception if index
column is null. However, when I override collection persister and force readIndex method
to return null, everything seems to work fine. Hibernate allows me to work with maps using
null value as a key. Though I havn't tested it extensivly yet.
What is the reason for disallowing null values as a keys? If there are possible
complicated error conditions, then this issue is a feature request for null-values support
for <map> mappings. If there are no errors possible, then constraining such behavior
is probably wrong.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira